エネルギー分散化:プロシューマー、カーボン・インセンティブ、市場行動
Decentralizing energy: prosumers, carbon incentives, and market behaviors (原題)
Pravesh Raghoo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本博士論文は、P2P電力取引におけるプロシューマー中心の転換を、市場設計・行動経済・制度の観点から4つの研究で分析する。モーリシャスの111世帯調査から、自律志向・価格志向・非単調型の3つの取引行動類型を特定。P2P取引に炭素オフセット収益を統合する「P2P+C」モデルを提案し、炭素インセンティブが取引意欲と価格反応性を有意に高めることをDiD設計で実証した。
English
This dissertation examines prosumer-centered transitions in peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading across four studies, situated in Mauritius. A nationwide survey of 111 households reveals three trading archetypes: autonomy-oriented, price-driven, and non-monotonic prosumers. It proposes a 'P2P+C' model integrating carbon offset monetization into local energy exchange, and empirically shows via a difference-in-differences design that carbon revenue significantly boosts willingness to trade and price responsiveness, especially among autonomy-oriented participants.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではFIT/FIP後の余剰電力活用や非化石証書・J-クレジット取引の拡大が議論されており、家庭・地域レベルのP2P取引と炭素価値の統合は、地域新電力やアグリゲーターの新たな収益モデルを検討する上で示唆に富む。カーボン・インセンティブが行動変容を促すという知見は、需要側の脱炭素インセンティブ設計に応用可能。
In the global GX context
The paper contributes to global debates on decentralized energy markets and climate finance by linking local P2P trading to voluntary/compliance carbon markets, with an explicit Global North–South transfer framing. It offers empirical behavioral evidence relevant to ISSB/CSRD-era discussions on how carbon value can be monetized at the household level and how incentive design shapes participation in transition finance mechanisms.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:P2P取引の行動類型と炭素インセンティブの因果効果を定量化した実証枠組みは、分散型エネルギー市場研究に有用。
🏢実務担当者:地域新電力・アグリゲーターは、炭素収益を組み込んだ二重収益モデルと行動セグメンテーションを顧客設計に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:家庭レベルのP2P取引と炭素市場を接続する制度設計や、行動多様性を考慮したインセンティブ政策の参考になる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
This dissertation investigates the behavioral, economic, and institutional dimensions of prosumer-centered transitions in peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading systems. Through four interlinked studies, it provides a comprehensive exploration of how decentralized energy platforms can be designed to support household-level energy autonomy while advancing market efficiency and climate mitigation goals. The research is situated in the context of Mauritius, a small island developing state facing pressing challenges of energy security, affordability, and decarbonization, and combines empirical modeling, survey experimentation, and market design. Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive review of P2P electricity trading. It synthesizes current academic and practical developments in market design, pricing mechanisms, and enabling technologies. The review categorizes market designs into centralized, decentralized, and distributed structures, and compares four pricing approaches: optimization, game theory, auction-based systems, and reinforcement learning. It highlights how emerging technologies like blockchain, IoT, artificial intelligence, and advanced communication networks support P2P energy systems. Importantly, the paper identifies persistent challenges in social acceptance, scalability, and regulation, especially the social ontology of trading behavior. A STEP analysis (Social, Technological, Economic, Political) frames future research needs to enhance the scalability, equity, and trustworthiness of P2P markets. This review offers critical insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to align decentralized energy markets with digital and decarbonized energy transitions. Chapter 3 explores the behavioral underpinnings of household participation in P2P energy trading, focusing on the trade-off between energy autonomy and financial incentives. Drawing on a nationwide survey with 111 households and applying multilevel regression and cluster analysis, the study identifies three distinct trading behavior archetypes: autonomy-oriented prosumers who limit trading to preserve stored energy, price-driven prosumers who prioritize economic gain, and non-monotonic prosumers with inconsistent trading patterns. The findings highlight that market liquidity in decentralized energy systems is shaped not only by physical capacity but by psychosocial preferences, underscoring the importance of designing user-centric platforms that accommodate behavioral diversity. Chapter 4 proposes a novel conceptual extension to the P2P trading model – the P2P+C framework –which integrates carbon offset monetization into local energy exchange. The model builds on the premise that P2P trading displaces grid-based fossil fuel consumption, generating verifiable carbon savings that can be bundled and sold on voluntary or compliance carbon markets. This integration creates a dual revenue stream for prosumers: earnings from electricity sales and dividends from carbon credit revenue. The framework positions P2P+C as a tool to link local energy resilience with global climate finance, particularly in off-grid and underserved regions, thereby democratizing access to sustainability resources and enabling financial transfers from carbon buyers in the Global North to communities in the Global South. Chapter 5 empirically tests the behavioral impact of the P2P+C model using a within-subjects Difference-in-Differences (DiD) design embedded in multilevel regression analysis. The results show that introducing carbon revenue significantly enhances both willingness to trade and price responsiveness among prosumers. Carbon incentives were especially effective in shifting the behavior of autonomy-oriented and threshold-based participants, suggesting that environmental monetization can act as a behavioral modulator in energy decision-making. Importantly, the study finds that prosumer engagement is better predicted by traits like risk-taking and community orientation than by standard socio-demographic factors, signaling the need for more nuanced segmentation and incentive strategies in P2P system design. Taken together, these chapters demonstrate that P2P energy trading systems are not purely technological constructs but socio-technical ecosystems shaped by behavioral dynamics and policy frameworks. The dissertation makes three central contributions: (1) it unpacks the micro-level behavioral constraints that influence market-level outcomes; (2) it introduces a financially viable mechanism for integrating climate value into decentralized energy systems; and (3) it empirically validates the effectiveness of compound incentive structures in enhancing participation. The findings offer actionable insights for platform developers, energy regulators, and climate finance institutions aiming to scale decentralized, equitable, and climate-aligned energy systems.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.58088/vrmp-ga46first seen 2026-09-18 04:46:50
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。