グリーンな中国に向けて：環境持続可能性の推進要因としてのエネルギー政策・技術革新・グリーン投資

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:政策・イノベーション・投資の連関フレームワークと地域不均一性の論点を、中国の移行研究の整理に活用できる。

🏢実務担当者:中国サプライチェーンや投資先のグリーン金融・炭素市場リスク、グリーンウォッシュ懸念を評価する際の背景知識になる。

🏛政策担当者:ターゲット型ガバナンスと市場メカニズムの組合せ、強度ベース上限の限界がカーボンプライシング設計の参考になる。

China’s pursuit of environmental sustainability has become one of the defining policy experiments of the twenty-first century, combining an ambitious dual-carbon pledge with the world’s largest deployment of clean-energy technology and green capital. This review synthesizes recent scholarship to examine how three interlocking levers, energy and climate policy, technological innovation, and green investment, jointly shape China’s transition toward a lower-carbon and more resilient development path. Drawing on a structured reading of peer-reviewed research published predominantly between 2019 and 2025, the article develops an integrated framework in which policy sets direction and incentives, innovation lowers the cost and expands the frontier of abatement, and investment mobilizes the capital required to translate intent into installed capacity. The evidence indicates that target-based governance, embodied in successive Five-Year Plans and the 2030/2060 carbon commitments, has been reinforced by market-based instruments such as the national emissions trading system, and by an expanding architecture of green credit and green bonds. Technological progress in solar photovoltaics, wind power, batteries, and electric mobility has driven steep learning curves, allowing renewable additions to exceed fossil capacity additions by wide margins in recent years. Green finance is shown across numerous provincial and firm-level studies to reduce carbon-emission intensity, chiefly by catalyzing green technological innovation and by reallocating capital away from pollution-intensive activities. Nevertheless, persistent tensions remain, including coal lock-in, energy-security concerns, uneven regional capacity, intensity-based rather than absolute caps, data-quality risks, and the danger of greenwashing. The review argues that the effectiveness of any single lever is conditional on its coherence with the others, and that spatial spillovers and regional heterogeneity mediate outcomes in ways that generic national narratives obscure. Case evidence is integrated throughout to ground the analysis in concrete provincial, sectoral, and corporate experience. The article closes by identifying priorities for policy design and an agenda for future research on the policy–innovation–investment nexus.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1979201first seen 2026-11-06 05:04:11