自主的炭素市場における環境完全性、市場参入と価値創出：EU・シンガポール・韓国の比較政策・制度分析
Environmental Integrity, Market Entry and Value Creation in the Voluntary Carbon Market: A Comparative Policy and Institutional Analysis of the EU, Singapore and the Republic of Korea (原題)
Hyun–Woo Lee, Myong-Seob Jeong, Hyung Joo Roh, Yong Woo Hwang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、自主的炭素市場（VCM）における環境完全性要件が、新興気候テック企業や炭素削減プロジェクト開発者の市場参入と価値創出にどう影響するかを、EU・シンガポール・韓国の制度を比較して分析する。SciValによる研究動向分析と法・政策・市場運営文書の質的分析を組み合わせ、完全性要件が参入条件と参入障壁を同時に構成することを示す。品質基準を緩和するのではなく、標準化・技術支援・負担軽減・集合的参加・初期段階金融といった参入促進条件で障壁に対処すべきと論じ、完全性・参入・価値（IEV）構造を提案する。
English
This study examines how environmental integrity requirements in the voluntary carbon market (VCM) shape market entry and value creation for climate-tech firms and project developers. Combining a SciVal research-landscape analysis with qualitative analysis of legal, policy and market documents, it compares the EU, Singapore and South Korea. It finds integrity requirements act as both market-access conditions and entry barriers, and proposes an Integrity–Entry–Value (IEV) framework, arguing entry burdens should be eased via standardization, technical support and early-stage finance rather than relaxed quality standards.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はJCMやGXリーグ、カーボンクレジット市場の整備を進めており、VCMの完全性と参入促進の制度設計はSSBJ開示や移行金融と連動する。特に後発市場向けの政策的含意は、日本のクレジット制度設計や企業のオフセット調達戦略に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD and Article 6 rules tighten integrity expectations, this paper maps how jurisdictions convert integrity requirements into entry-enabling conditions. It adds a comparative institutional lens to global VCM scholarship, relevant to transition finance and corporate offset strategies under evolving disclosure regimes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:VCMの制度設計と市場形成を、完全性・参入・価値の条件付き枠組みで捉える視点を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:炭素クレジット調達やオフセット戦略において、完全性要件と参入コストを踏まえた市場選択に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:後発炭素市場の設計において、品質基準を維持しつつ参入促進策を組み合わせる政策示唆を得られる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The voluntary carbon market (VCM) certifies and trades greenhouse gas mitigation and removal outcomes generated outside compliance markets, yet concerns about additionality, measurement, reporting and verification (MRV), double counting and credit quality continue to constrain market credibility. Stringent integrity requirements may simultaneously increase the cost and expertise burden borne by new climate-tech firms and carbon mitigation project developers. This study examines how institutional requirements for environmental integrity are connected to the market entry and value creation of these actors. A SciVal-based research landscape analysis is combined with a qualitative analysis of legal, policy and market-operation documents, and the European Union, Singapore and the Republic of Korea are compared functionally as cases with different institutional contexts and stages of development. The comparison shows that integrity requirements simultaneously constitute market-access conditions and entry requirements, that entry burdens are addressed not by relaxing quality standards but by entry-enabling conditions such as standardization, technical and advisory support, burden mitigation, collective participation and early-stage finance, and that market participation is converted into economic value only where revenue realization, price valuation, revenue predictability and commercial scaling operate. On this basis, an Integrity–Entry–Value (IEV) structure is proposed as a conditional rather than linear account of VCM formation, offering conditional policy implications for late-forming markets.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202609.1276.v1first seen 2026-09-17 04:52:29
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。