航空旅行によるCOVID-19の気候便益の固定化：インドIT企業と持続可能な航空旅行政策を共創する4年間プログラムの実地証拠
Locking-in climate-benefits of COVID-19 from air travel: field evidence from a 4-year program to co-create sustainable air travel policies with Indian IT companies (原題)
(著者不明)
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
FairTravelプログラムは2021年以降、インドIT産業と協働し、過剰な航空移動の削減に取り組んできた。社会実践理論を用い、マインドセット・行動・政策の相互変容を図り、EU顧客とのScope3排出共同対処や従業員アクティビズム、SAFや水素航空機への過度な期待の複雑化を検討する。4年間の知見と成果を提示する。
English
The FairTravel program has worked with India's IT industry since 2021 to cut corporate flying, a major Scope 3 emissions source. Using social-practice theory, it shifts mindset, behavior, and policy together, engaging EU clients on shared Scope 3 reduction and SBT progress. It examines employee activism, inequitable burden-sharing, and techno-optimism around SAF and hydrogen aircraft.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業もScope3の航空排出削減がSBTi・SSBJ対応で重要性を増す。顧客との共同削減や従業員巻き込みの実践知は、国内IT・製造業の出張政策見直しに示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Adds rare Global South empirical evidence on corporate flying reduction as a Scope 3 lever, directly relevant to SBTi and ISSB/CSRD disclosure of business travel emissions and client-supplier co-abatement.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a social-practice theory lens and 4-year field evidence on organizational behavior change for Scope 3 air travel.
🏢実務担当者:Shows how to engage clients and employees to cut business flying while avoiding inequitable burden-sharing pitfalls.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for structural policy support beyond voluntary corporate action on aviation emissions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Extended abstract 6-147-26 The FairTravel program has been working with India’s IT industry since 2021 to reduce flying, due to its exceptional contribution to climate crisis that affects all while serving a small population of corporate elite. By working with 4 large IT organizations as early adopters of change, it has worked to shift the discourse on excess flying y employing social-practice theory: shifting both mindset and practice (behavior) and structural change (policy) as both are contributors to and the result of each other. The paper illuminates programmatic insights and results of the first 4 years of work. It examines the need for engaging directly with EU-based clients to jointly address this Scope 3 emissions issue since one flight reduction helps 2 organizations make progress on Science-based Reduction Targets, the role of employee activism in advocating for radical structural changes that repudiate approaches embedded in organizational orthodoxy and achieve incremental changes at best, the visceral influence of loss of livelihood and displacement caused by aviation related mega- projects on employee perception of flying and its negative externalities greatly outweighing the psychological influence of ‘abstract’ harm to the climate. The paper also interrogates the role of valorizing personal climate-sensitive actions by internal and external discourse-shaping actors (influencers) such as company CEOs, cultural/sports icons as well as the negative consequences of strategies that over-emphasize cost-reduction benefits of reduced flying which is conflated with inequitable burden-sharing i.e. low-cost economy class flying is constrained while senior management flies unabated in business class. The potential benefits of complicating the oversimplified narrative of sustainable aviation fuels as being a ‘savior’ that will usher in guilt-free flying in the future, and problematizing techno-fantasies of hydrogen aircraft, electric aircraft etc. as system-change levers is also examined. Download presentation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://eceeeproceedings.org/articles/137/files/6a97f76e38803.pdffirst seen 2026-09-12 05:16:01 · last seen 2026-09-22 04:52:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。