Mapping the Green Taxonomy Research Landscape: A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainability, Finance, and Policy Convergence
グリーンタクソノミー研究のマッピング：持続可能性、金融、政策の収束に関する計量書誌学的分析 (AI 翻訳)
Byounguk Keum, Jihyung Joo, Taewoo Roh
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はグリーンタクソノミーに関する既存研究を計量書誌学的手法で体系的にレビューし、3つのテーマクラスターと研究ギャップを特定した。EU中心の研究が多い中、地域比較や実装課題の研究不足を指摘し、今後の研究課題を提示している。
English
This paper systematically reviews green taxonomy research using bibliometric analysis, identifying three thematic clusters and research gaps. It notes over-reliance on EU contexts and calls for more comparative and implementation-focused studies to enhance practical relevance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもGXリーグやSSBJの議論が進む中、グリーンタクソノミーの国際的な研究動向を俯瞰することは、国内の制度設計や開示基準の策定において示唆に富む。特に実装課題や地域特性の考慮は、日本のGX推進に重要である。
In the global GX context
As green taxonomies proliferate globally (EU Taxonomy, China, Singapore), this bibliometric review provides a structured overview of research trends and gaps, highlighting the need for cross-regional studies and practical implementation insights—critical for ISSB, CSRD, and transition finance frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured map of green taxonomy research themes and gaps, guiding future research directions.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights implementation challenges and regional variations that companies should consider when aligning with taxonomies.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the need for comparative policy studies and case-based evidence to inform taxonomy design and enforcement.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Green taxonomy is regarded as a system to classify economic sectors and activities that constitute sustainable activities. Although the European Union has worked to reinforce its framework for steering ecological investment, prior research has not adequately explained how green taxonomy actually shapes firms' investment choices, the movement of capital, or sustainability outcomes across different institutional contexts. This study systematically synthesizes existing research on green taxonomy through bibliometric analysis and thematic mapping to (1) identify the key research themes and their evolution, (2) review empirical evidence on green taxonomy's feasibility in promoting sustainable investments and corporate practices, and (3) reveal potential research gaps, particularly, regarding implementation challenges and regional variations. Our review identified three thematic clusters on green taxonomy research and discussed geographical, methodological, and theoretical gaps. We contribute by shedding light on the emergent research topic and their gap in research and propose future research to diversify methods to strengthen empirical foundations, broaden geographical scope beyond the EU for comparative insights, and develop case‐based studies to enhance practical relevance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70644first seen 2026-05-15 21:06:19
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。