← 論文一覧に戻る

緩和か適応か?ファジーDombi-Bonferroni最良-最悪法を用いた港湾気候レジリエンス戦略の時間シナリオに基づく優先順位の解明

Mitigation or adaptation? Unveiling the temporal scenario-based priorities of port climate resilience strategies using fuzzy Dombi-Bonferroni best-worst method (原題)

Qian Fu, Sang Yoon Lee

Journal of International Logistics and Trade📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-31#気候リスク対象セクター: transport
DOI: 10.1108/jilt-02-2026-0017
原典: https://www.emerald.com/jilt/article-pdf/doi/10.1108/JILT-02-2026-0017/11809280/jilt-02-2026-0017en.pdf
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

韓国の港湾専門家9名の判断に基づき、ファジーDombi-Bonferroni最良-最悪法を用いて、短期的・長期的な時間軸を考慮した港湾気候レジリエンス戦略の優先順位を評価。結果、長期的緩和策が最優先され、適応策では短期的なものが優先されることが示された。港湾当局はネットゼロ経路と緊急時対応計画のバランスが重要。

English

This study prioritizes Port Climate Resilience Strategies (PCRSs) by integrating a time-horizon perspective, using the Fuzzy Dombi-Bonferroni Best-Worst Method with nine Korean maritime experts. Results show a preference for mitigation over adaptation, with long-term mitigation ranked highest and short-term adaptation prioritized over long-term adaptation. The study suggests ports should adopt net-zero pathways and contingency planning, and policymakers should promote long-term structural planning.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の港湾は気候変動リスクへの対応が急務であり、国土交通省の港湾計画やインフラ投資判断に示唆を与える。時間軸を考慮した戦略優先順位は、SSBJ開示やTCFD対応にも有用。

In the global GX context

This study contributes to global climate resilience scholarship by integrating time-horizon perspectives into port strategy prioritization. It offers a methodological framework applicable to ports worldwide, aligning with TCFD and ISSB disclosure expectations for climate resilience planning.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:港湾気候戦略の優先順位決定に時間軸を組み込んだMCDM手法の応用例として参考になる。

🏢実務担当者:港湾管理者は、長期的な緩和策と短期的な適応策のバランスを取るための具体的な優先順位の考え方を得られる。

🏛政策担当者:港湾インフラ投資の長期的計画と短期的対応のバランスを促す政策立案に示唆を与える。

📄 Abstract(原文)

This study aims to prioritize Port Climate Resilience Strategies (PCRSs) by integrating a time-horizon perspective (short-term vs. long-term) to distinguish between Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, addressing the strategic trade-offs often overlooked in existing literature. The Fuzzy Dombi-Bonferroni Best-Worst Method (FDB-BWM) was employed as a flexible aggregation framework to prioritize PCRSs based on the judgments of nine experts from the maritime sector in the Republic of Korea. The results indicate an overall preference for mitigation strategies over adaptation strategies. Long-term mitigation receives the highest priority, followed by short-term mitigation. In contrast, adaptation strategies exhibit a temporal reversal, with short-term adaptation receiving higher priority than long-term adaptation. At the sub-criteria level, long-term emission reduction commitment and future fuel transition rank highest, while contingency planning dominates short-term adaptation priorities. Sensitivity analysis suggests that the prioritization results are generally consistent across parameter settings. The findings suggest that port authorities should adopt explicit net-zero pathways to guide long-term infrastructure decisions while enhancing operational readiness through contingency planning for immediate continuity. Policymakers are advised to promote a shift toward long-term structural planning to prevent underinvestment in physical resilience. Furthermore, authorities should maintain strategic flexibility amid dynamic resource constraints by balancing immediate operational expenditures with sustained low-cost pre-investment planning for long-term capital investments. This study is among the first to integrate a time-horizon perspective into the prioritization of port climate resilience strategies. It also extends the application of the FDB-BWM to the port resilience and climate strategy domain.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。