The PM 2.5 -Related and O 3 -Related Health Co-Benefits of Emission Trading Scheme: A Case Study in China
PM2.5およびO3に関連する排出権取引制度の健康コベネフィット：中国の事例研究 (AI 翻訳)
Shuyang Chen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、中国の排出権取引制度（ETS）がPM2.5とO3汚染削減を通じてもたらす健康コベネフィットを、計算可能一般均衡（CGE）モデルを用いて2025年から2060年にわたり定量化した。結果、両汚染物質が労働投入と経済産出に悪影響を与える一方、ETSはその負の影響を緩和することを示した。健康コベネフィットを考慮すると、ETSの短期的なGDP低下は緩和されるものの、完全には相殺されない。
English
This paper quantifies the health co-benefits of China's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) from reduced PM2.5 and O3 pollution using a Computable General Equilibrium model from 2025 to 2060. It finds that both pollutants negatively impact labor and economic output, and the ETS slightly alleviates these effects. Incorporating health co-benefits reduces the short-term GDP loss from ETS abatement costs, but does not fully offset them.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもカーボンプライシング（J-ETS等）の導入が議論される中、本論文は排出権取引の副次的便益（健康改善）を定量的に示す点で参考になる。特に、大気汚染が深刻な地域では、ETSの社会的受容性向上に寄与する可能性がある。
In the global GX context
As carbon pricing mechanisms expand globally, this study provides a framework for quantifying the health co-benefits of ETS, which are often overlooked in cost-benefit analyses. The methodology can inform policymakers in other countries, including those in the EU and Asia, about the ancillary benefits of emissions trading.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a CGE-based method to integrate health impacts into ETS evaluation, useful for environmental-economic modeling studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers evidence that ETS can yield health co-benefits, which can be communicated to stakeholders to strengthen the business case for carbon pricing.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of including health co-benefits in ETS policy design to justify abatement costs and enhance public support.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Anthropogenic carbon emissions and air pollutant emissions often share common sources. Designed to mitigate carbon emissions, an emission trading scheme (ETS) may also reduce air pollutant emissions, thereby generating health co-benefits from improved air quality. Nevertheless, such health co-benefits are often overlooked in ETS evaluations. This paper aims to bridge this research gap by quantifying the health co-benefits of the ETS resulting from the reduction of PM 2.5 and O 3 pollutions in China over the period from 2025 to 2060, using a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. The model results indicate that both PM 2.5 and O 3 pollutions negatively impact labor input and thus economic output, with the impact of PM 2.5 pollution more pronounced than that of O 3 pollution. The ETS slightly alleviates the negative economic consequences of air pollution. Although the ETS incurs abatement costs, leading to a short-term reduction in GDP, this negative effect is relieved in the long term. Considering the health co-benefits derived from reduced air pollution, the negative economic consequences of the ETS are lessened, even though these co-benefits cannot fully offset the abatement costs.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261421993first seen 2026-05-05 22:45:02
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。