← 論文一覧に戻る

EU炭素国境調整措置における外国炭素価格の限定的な認識：中国への政策オプション

The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism's Restricted Recognition of Foreign Carbon Pricing: Policy Options for China (原題)

Jingyi Wang

Journal of World Tradeプレプリント2026-01-01#炭素価格Origin: CN経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.7153338
原典: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7153338

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

EU CBAMが2026年に完全施行されると中国の輸出に影響を与える。中国の排出権取引制度の炭素価格はEU ETSの数分の一であり、本稿は資源税と消費税を実効炭素価格としてCBAMのクレジット対象に含めることを提案する。しかし、間接的な炭素価格を考慮してもEUと中国の実効炭素価格の差は大きく、経済の脱炭素化が本質的な解決策であると指摘する。

English

As the EU CBAM becomes fully effective in 2026, it will impact Chinese exports. China's ETS carbon price is a fraction of the EU ETS, and this paper proposes including resource tax and consumption tax as effective carbon prices to reduce CBAM costs. However, the gap remains significant even with indirect carbon prices, and decarbonizing China's economy is the fundamental solution.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本企業にとってもCBAMは輸出コストに直結する問題であり、中国の事例は日本が同様の課題に直面した際の参考になる。また、日本の炭素税や地球温暖化対策税をCBAMのクレジットとして認めさせる交渉材料としても示唆に富む。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to the global debate on CBAM's recognition of foreign carbon pricing, offering a framework for evaluating implicit carbon prices. It is relevant for jurisdictions like Japan and others with carbon taxes or ETSs seeking to mitigate CBAM's impact on their exporters.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a method for calculating effective carbon prices and analyzing CBAM's impact on trade.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for exporters to understand CBAM costs and potential mitigation strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights policy options for countries to negotiate CBAM crediting and underscores the need for domestic decarbonization.

📄 Abstract（原文）

When the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) adopted by the European Commission becomes fully effective in 2026, it will inevitably affect exports from China and other jurisdictions. The EU CBAM requires that imports into the EU carry a carbon price similar to that of items manufactured within the EU. Although China has a national carbon emissions trading system (ETS), its current carbon price is a mere fraction of that of the EU ETS. This article supports the expansion of CBAM crediting of carbon pricing in third countries by using an effective carbon pricing method that covers both explicit and implicit carbon prices. Two taxes collected in China, resource tax and consumption tax, can be considered as effective carbon prices, which could help reduce the CBAM cost on Chinese exporters. Nevertheless, this article points out that the gap between the EU's and China's effective carbon prices will still be significant even after taking indirect carbon prices into account. Advocating the expansion of the CBAM crediting rules can only be a stopgap approach compared with decarbonizing China's economy.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。