グローバルサウスの都市部調理：社会的側面、緊急性、気候緩和ポテンシャル
Urban cooking in the global south: Social dimensions, urgency, and climate mitigation potential (原題)
Firuz Ahamed Nahid, Abhishek Das, Leila Niamir, Giulia Ulpiani, Joyashree Roy
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
グローバルサウス50都市・42研究の系統的レビュー。調理燃料転換の緩和ポテンシャルは2035年までに約0.043GtCO2、コストは47.6〜75.7ドル/tCO2と試算。経済・社会文化的制約が最大の障壁で、ジェンダー包摂的な金融、供給網の安定、LPGから電化への移行を盛り込む制度設計を政策優先事項として提示する。
English
A systematic review of 42 studies across 50 Global South cities on household cooking fuel transitions. Mitigation potential is estimated at ~0.043 GtCO2 by 2035 at USD 47.6–75.7/tCO2. Economic and socio-cultural constraints are the most pervasive barriers; the authors recommend gender-inclusive finance, supply-chain security, and institutional roadmaps for LPG-to-electric cooking.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業のGX実務への直接的接続は薄いが、途上国の調理燃料転換はクリーンクッキング・ファイナンスやクレジット案件として商社・エネルギー企業が関与しうる領域であり、国際協力・移行金融の文脈で参考になる。
In the global GX context
Adds empirical evidence on a hard-to-abate, under-disclosed segment of the energy transition relevant to transition finance and just-transition debates. Its feasibility framework (six dimensions) offers a template for assessing socio-cultural barriers that global disclosure frameworks rarely capture.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Feasibility and cost estimates for cooking-fuel transitions in the Global South, with a six-dimension framework applicable to other hard-to-abate transitions.
🏢実務担当者:Limited direct use, but relevant for firms engaged in clean-cooking finance, LPG distribution, or carbon-credit projects in emerging markets.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for cross-sector policy coherence, gender-inclusive finance, and explicit LPG-to-electric cooking targets in national energy roadmaps.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Home cooking is an essential socio-cultural practice in the Global South shaped by shared meanings. Cooking fuel transition is a complex issue. It involves social and political economy contexts, household experiences, motivation, perceptions, justice and inclusivity, over and above technology supported by appropriate infrastructure access. Evidence on comprehensive, realistic, empirically grounded pathways for durable cooking fuel transitions remains limited. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 42 studies from 50 cities in the Global South. The technical mitigation potential estimate is ~0.043 GtCO₂ by 2035. Indicative cost is USD 47.6–75.7/tCO₂. Health, economic, social and environmental benefits make the transition techno-economically attractive. Feasibility of transition across six dimensions identifies economic and socio-cultural constraints as the most pervasive barriers and deeply entrenched reasons. Institutional feasibility depends on cross-sector policy coherence. Informal settlements, where 16% of urban households globally rely on solid fuels for cooking, remain a hard-to-abate segment for the cooking fuel transition owing to the complex political economy of development patterns and governance landscapes. Overall, the study identifies three policy priorities for a durable and inclusive transition: gender-inclusive and equity-sensitive financial instruments; investment to ensure supply chain security and provide access to reliable energy services; and institutional arrangements for explicit LPG-to-decarbonized electric cooking for all in national energy roadmaps. To help overcome sticky socio-cultural habits, policies need to accommodate the time needed for an experiential journey through various fuel use by households to gain agency in making a choice toward cleaner fuel in the longer run.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.105037first seen 2026-11-07 04:38:22
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。