← 論文一覧に戻る

A New Approach to LCA Evaluation of Lamb Meat Production in Two Different Breeding Systems in Northern Italy

北イタリアの2つの異なる飼育システムにおける子羊生産のLCA評価の新しいアプローチ (AI 翻訳)

Andreas Geß, Irene Viola, Silvia Miretti, Elisabetta Macchi, G. Perona, Luca Maria Battaglini, Mario Baratta

Frontiers in Veterinary Science📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2020-09-28#炭素会計Origin: EU対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00651
原典: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00651
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

イタリア北部の2つの羊飼育システム(半集約的・半放牧的)を対象に、ライフサイクルアセスメント(LCA)と動物福祉(コルチゾール蓄積)を組み合わせた統合分析を実施。集約的農場は地球温暖化係数で低い影響を示す一方、局所的な環境影響は高く、放牧型農場は動物福祉で優位だった。EUの羊肉生産システムにおける持続可能性評価の標準化を目指す。

English

This study integrates Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with animal welfare (cortisol accumulation) analysis for two sheep farming systems in northern Italy (semi-extensive and semi-intensive). The intensive farm showed lower global warming potential but higher local environmental impacts, while the extensive farm had better animal welfare. It aims to provide a standard for individualized sustainability assessments of European lamb production.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の畜産業でもGHG排出削減が課題となっており、LCAと動物福祉を統合した本手法は、持続可能な畜産評価の参考になる。ただし、地域特性が強いため日本への適用にはデータの再構築が必要。

In the global GX context

Combines LCA with animal welfare in a novel way, contributing to global discussions on sustainable food systems and agricultural emissions (Scope 3). Offers a methodological template for region-specific LCA studies that balance environmental and ethical concerns.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a replicable LCA + animal welfare framework for livestock systems, useful for future sustainability assessments.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into trade-offs between intensification and environmental impacts, though not directly actionable for corporate disclosure.

🏛政策担当者:Informs agricultural policy on balancing emissions reduction with animal welfare standards.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Lamb meat production provides vital landscape-management and ecosystem services; however, ruminant farming produces a considerable share of the world's greenhouse gas emissions. To measure and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the intensification of livestock farming, an integrative analysis was conducted in this study by combining environmental impact analysis and animal welfare assessment. This approach is the first of its kind and is the innovative aspect of this paper. The methodology of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) entails the holistic analysis of various impact categories and the associated emission quantities of products, services, and resources over their life cycle, including resource extraction and processing, production processes, transport, usage, and the end of life. The outlines of LCA are standardized in DIN EN ISO 14040/14044. To assess the environmental impacts of the production of lamb meat in northern Italy, two case studies were undertaken using the LCA software GaBi. The analysis is based on primary data from two sheep-breeding systems (semi-extensive and semi-intensive in alpine and continental bioregions, respectively) combined with inventory data from the GaBi database and data from the literature. The assessment was conducted for the functional unit of 1 kg of lamb meat and focuses on the impact categories global warming potential, acidification potential, and eutrophication potential. For an overall evaluation of the supply chain, we have also considered a parameter indicating animal welfare, in keeping with consumer concerns, employing an analysis of chronic stress as shown by cortisol accumulation. The goal is to derive models and recommendations for an efficient, more sustainable use of resources without compromising animal welfare, meat quality, and competitiveness. The aim of this study is to provide a standard for individualized sustainability analyses for European lamb production systems in the future. From the LCA perspective, the more intensive case-study farm showed a lower impact in global impact factors and a higher impact in local impact categories in comparison with the more extensively run farm that was studied. From the animal welfare perspective, lower amounts of the stress hormone cortisol were found on the extensively managed case-study farm.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。