遡及アーカイブされたプロトコルとデータセット：英国中小企業における水素貨物輸送準備状況の系統的レビュー
Retrospectively archived protocol and datasets: A systematic review of hydrogen freight readiness among UK SMEs (原題)
Rahman, Samiur, Alkaraan, Fadi, Aly, Doaa
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本記録は、2021〜2025年に公表された英国の水素貨物輸送導入・準備状況に関する中小企業（SME）対象の系統的レビューのプロトコルとデータセットを遡及的にアーカイブしたものである。PRISMA 2020に準拠し、検索記録、スクリーニング行列、QuADS評価、146件のコード化された知見を収録する。単独レビュアーによる実施にAI支援チェックと上司の整合性確認を組み合わせた点、および事後分析（A1〜A3）を追記した点が特徴である。
English
This record retrospectively archives the protocol and datasets for a PRISMA 2020 systematic review of UK evidence (2021-2025) on hydrogen freight adoption and readiness among SMEs. It includes search records, a full screening matrix, QuADS appraisal, and 146 coded findings, with AI-assisted checks and a supervisor consistency check. Version 1.1 adds four documented protocol amendments, including post hoc sensitivity analyses.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも水素社会推進法や水素サプライチェーン構築が政策課題となる中、SMEの導入準備という視点は国内の水素利活用支援策や中小企業のGX対応を考える上で参考になる。ただし英国文脈のレビューであり、日本の開示制度への直接的含意は限定的。
In the global GX context
As global hydrogen strategies scale, understanding SME readiness for hydrogen freight is a gap in transition-finance and industrial-decarbonization literature. The transparent, retrospectively archived methodology offers a template for reproducible evidence synthesis relevant to disclosure-grade research quality.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:水素貨物輸送とSME準備状況のエビデンス統合手法、およびPRISMA準拠の透明なアーカイブ実践の参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:水素物流への移行を検討する物流・製造業のSMEが、導入障壁や準備要件を把握する手がかりとなる。
🏛政策担当者:水素インフラ政策においてSME支援策を設計する際のエビデンス基盤として参照できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This record archives the protocol and supporting datasets for a systematic review of UK evidence published between 2021 and 2025 on hydrogen freight adoption and readiness among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The review is reported under PRISMA 2020. It was not registered prospectively. The protocol was archived retrospectively, after screening, full-text assessment, appraisal and extraction were complete, and it records the methods as carried out, following the structure of PRISMA-P 2015. Contents Protocol (version 1.0): aims and review questions, eligibility criteria and decision rules R1–R12, search strategies as run, selection process, quality appraisal with QuADS, data extraction, framework synthesis, verification checks and limitations. Search records (RIS): Scopus, ProQuest (ABI/INFORM), IEEE Xplore, three Google Scholar queries, TRID and two rounds of citation chasing. Screening matrix: every record and decision, with the PRISMA 2020 counts. Re-screen results: two intra-rater re-screens of Stage 1 decisions. Supervisor consistency-check record. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. Extraction and QuADS dataset: study characteristics, 146 coded findings and appraisal scores. Notes. One human reviewer carried out screening, appraisal and extraction, with AI-assisted checks and a supervisor consistency check described in the protocol. These checks are not equivalent to independent duplicate screening. Version 1.1. This version adds three files and leaves all other files unchanged. Protocol_amendment_v1.1.pdf records four amendments to the protocol (A1 to A4) without rewriting version 1.0. Cost_assumption_audit.xlsx holds the audit data for amendment A1. Coding_check_results.xlsx holds the data for amendment A2. These are the sampled findings, three sets of codes, agreement statistics and the disagreement log. Amendments A1 to A3 are post hoc analyses added after the synthesis was complete. A3 is a sensitivity analysis without the five review articles. A4 is administrative.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/24148154first seen 2026-11-12 04:11:09
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。