Green Growth Policy in Visegrad: Key Drivers from an Economic and Non-economic Perspective
ヴィシェグラード諸国におけるグリーン成長政策：経済的・非経済的観点からの主要な推進要因 (AI 翻訳)
(著者不明)
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ヴィシェグラード諸国（V4）におけるグリーン成長政策の実施状況を評価し、環境政策の厳格さ、炭素税、グリーンファイナンスが温室効果ガス排出、再生可能エネルギー比率、物質生産性、グリーンパテントに与える影響をパネルFMOLSで推定した。EU要件が主な推進力であり、炭素税の効果は限定的だが、グリーンファイナンスはグリーンパテントと物質生産性に小さな正の効果を持つ。
English
This study evaluates green growth policies in Visegrad countries using panel FMOLS. It finds that EU requirements are the main driver, carbon taxes have limited effect on emissions or renewables, but green finance positively influences green patents and material productivity.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX推進法に基づくカーボンプライシング（化石燃料賦課金・有償オークション）が導入されつつあるが、本論文は炭素税の効果が限定的である可能性を示唆しており、日本の政策設計においても補完的なグリーンファイナンスの重要性を再認識させる。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical evidence from Central Europe that carbon taxes alone may not drive significant emission reductions, while green finance can spur innovation. It contributes to the global debate on policy mix design for green growth, relevant for regions like the EU and Japan.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical estimates of policy effects on green growth indicators in Visegrad countries, useful for comparative policy analysis.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the limited impact of carbon taxes and the positive role of green finance, informing corporate strategy on innovation and sustainability investments.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that carbon taxes need complementary measures like green finance to effectively promote green technology and material productivity.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Purpose: This chapter evaluates the state of the implementation of the green growth policies in the Visegrad countries. The authors examine the main determinants of the transition to a green economy. Need for the study: Conventional economic growth, based on fossil fuel and the extensive use of other natural resources, has created many environmental problems. The current industry-based economic growth in the Visegrad countries is not exempt from these challenges. Therefore, a transition from the current economic growth system in the Visegrad countries to a green growth system is essential. Methodology: After qualitative analysis of green growth policies, the study applies panel Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) to estimate the effects of environmental policy strictness, carbon taxes, green finance on greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, the share of renewable energy in total energy consumption, material productivity and green patents. Findings: The European Union (EU) requirements are the primary motivation for implementing green growth policies in the Visegrad countries. Carbon taxes do not have a sizable effect on GHG emissions or increasing the share of renewable energy consumption. However, green finance has a small positive effect on the number of green patents and material productivity. Practical implications: The results of this study can guide policymakers in better formulating a green transition strategy for the Visegrad countries. Green technology is the ultimate driver of green growth. This study's findings highlight that government financial support is crucial for developing new green technologies and implementation of existing technologies for mass production.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83608-462-420251012first seen 2026-05-05 19:07:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。