Carbon Anxiety, Regulatory Pressure and Employee Green Behavior in the Low-Carbon Transition: Evidence from Poland’s Energy Sector
低炭素移行における炭素不安、規制圧力と従業員のグリーン行動:ポーランドエネルギー部門からのエビデンス (AI 翻訳)
Anna Rogozińska‐Pawełczyk, Maksymilian Czuk
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ポーランドのエネルギー部門従業員857名を対象に、炭素不安と規制圧力が従業員のグリーン行動(EGB)に与える影響を調査。心理的契約履行(PCFE)が媒介し、環境意識がその効果を強化することを発見。分散の約37%を説明するモデルを提示。
English
This study examines how carbon anxiety and regulatory pressure affect employee green behavior (EGB) via psychological contract fulfillment for the environment (PCFE), using survey data from 857 Polish energy sector employees. Pro-environmental consciousness moderates the PCFE-EGB link. The model explains 37.1% of EGB variance, highlighting relational mechanisms in decarbonization implementation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のエネルギー部門でも、SSBJ対応やScope3削減が進む中、従業員の心理的契約とグリーン行動の関連は実務上有用。本知見は、日本の企業が脱炭素目標を従業員に浸透させる際の留意点を示唆する。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on the micro-foundations of the low-carbon transition. It provides empirical evidence that regulatory pressure alone is insufficient; organizations must foster psychological contract fulfillment through credible commitments and participation. Relevant for jurisdictions like the EU and US implementing climate disclosure and transition plans.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a theoretically grounded model linking transition pressures to employee green behavior via psychological contract fulfillment.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of clear environmental commitments and employee participation to translate regulatory pressure into green behavior.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that regulation alone may be insufficient; internal organizational factors like employee perceptions matter for decarbonization implementation.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The low-carbon transition depends not only on technologies and regulation, but also on how employees interpret and enact organizational environmental commitments. This study examines whether carbon anxiety—employees’ perception of organization-focused uncertainty and insufficient preparedness regarding carbon accounting, emissions reduction, reporting, and operational adaptation—and perceived regulatory pressure are associated with employee green behavior (EGB) through psychological contract fulfillment for the environment (PCFE), and whether pro-environmental consciousness strengthens the PCFE–EGB association. Using a cross-sectional computer-assisted web interview survey of 857 employees in Poland’s energy sector, the proposed second-stage moderated mediation model was tested with structural equation modeling and bootstrap analysis. Carbon anxiety and regulatory pressure were positively associated with psychological contract fulfillment for the environment, which was positively associated with employee green behavior. Pro-environmental consciousness strengthened the psychological contract fulfillment for the environment–behavior relationship, and both conditional indirect associations increased at higher pro-environmental consciousness levels. The model explained 33.2% of the variance in psychological contract fulfillment for the environment and 37.1% in employee green behavior; the main pattern remained stable across robustness and subsector analyses. The observed associations support psychological contract fulfillment for the environment as a theoretically specified relational mechanism linking transition pressures with the employee-level implementation of decarbonization. Given the cross-sectional design, the results indicate associations rather than causal effects. Organizations should translate transition pressures into credible environmental commitments, workforce capabilities, transparent communication, and meaningful employee participation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147027first seen 2026-07-13 05:40:34
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。