← 論文一覧に戻る

Fishes, red sludge, and wind in the Mediterranean. An ethnography of overturnings in the EU energy transition

魚、レッドスラッジ、地中海の風。EUエネルギー転換における転覆の民族誌 (AI 翻訳)

Elena Apostoli Cappello

Ethnography📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-25#エネルギー転換Origin: EU対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.1177/14661381261452963
原典: https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381261452963
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、サルデーニャ島スルチス地域を事例に、EUのエネルギー転換政策に対する地域の反対運動を民族誌的に分析する。石炭依存の製鉄所から洋上・陸上風力発電への転換計画に対し、住民は景観収奪を土地収奪になぞらえ、EU機関の統治の正統性に疑問を投げかけている。異なる時間軸が交錯する過渡期の事例を示す。

English

This ethnographic study examines local opposition to EU energy transition policies in Sulcis, Sardinia, where a coal-dependent steel plant is planned to be converted into a wind energy hub. Local resistance frames landscape/seascape grabbing as akin to land grabbing and questions the legitimacy of European institutions to govern transitions. The paper reveals overlapping temporalities of dispossession in a transition still in progress.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、洋上風力発電を巡る地域紛争が各地で発生しており(例:秋田県能代市など)、本稿の住民の視点と反対運動のメカニズムは示唆に富む。ただし、日本固有の政策文脈(FIT、再エネ海域利用法)との直接的な関連は薄い。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global discourse on energy transition governance by highlighting grassroots opposition and legitimacy deficits. While the EU's Green Deal drives similar conflicts across Europe, the ethnographic approach offers nuanced insights into 'peripheral' regions becoming new centers of transition, relevant for policymakers and developers facing local resistance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a qualitative, ethnographic lens on energy transition conflicts, useful for scholars studying socio-technical transitions and local opposition.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of procedural legitimacy and local engagement in renewable energy planning; relevant for EU and national policymakers.

📄 Abstract(原文)

This article takes Sulcis, a Sardinian ex-mining sub-region, as a case study, and aims to place it in a regional dimension, analyzing local attitudes and opposition to EU energy transition policies against a background of industrial and environmental crises. Here the Green Deal-promoted energy transitions taking place involve a whole industrial system of carbon-dependent and coal-fired steel processing, which is the target of a large national plan to convert it into a regional-scale platform for onshore and offshore wind farms. Focusing on local opposition, the article shows a new kind of case study, a transition still in progress, suggesting that spaces classified as peripheral in anthropological studies on energy are in fact new centers of transition. When discussing energy speculation, local opposition likens the mechanisms of landscape grabbing—or seascape grabbing—to land grabbing. Local opposition to mega wind farms is supported by a deeper political opposition, which questions the very legitimacy of European institutions to govern transitions at the local level. Different local temporalities are intertwined in this process, overlapping experiences of dispossession.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。