食品ロスと廃棄：規模、栄養学的含意、環境的影響、削減戦略—インドネシアを中心としたナラティブレビュー
Food Loss and Waste: Magnitude, Nutritional Implications, Environmental Consequences, and Strategies for Reduction — A Narrative Review with Special Reference to Indonesia (原題)
Adelia Paradya Zetta, W. Hasibuan, B. C. Walter, Honey Yahdillah
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
世界の食品の約13%が供給網で損失し、インドネシアは年間1人当たり53〜84kgの食品廃棄を生み、その約8割が家庭由来である。本レビューは食品ロス・廃棄（FLW）の規模、要因、栄養・環境・経済への三重の負荷を整理し、教育やナッジ、期限表示改革、財政措置、再分配の有効性を評価する。SDG12.3達成には測定・行動・規制・技術を組み合わせた多部門の協調が必要と結論づける。
English
This narrative review synthesizes evidence on food loss and waste (FLW), noting ~13% of global food is lost in supply chains and Indonesia generates 53–84 kg/capita/year, ~80% from households. It frames FLW as a triple nutritional, environmental (GHG, water, land), and economic burden, and assesses behavioural, labelling, fiscal, and redistribution strategies. It concludes SDG 12.3 requires coordinated measurement, behavioural, regulatory, and technological action.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも食品ロス削減推進法や食品リサイクル法があり、事業者のScope 3・廃棄物開示と接続しうる。ただし本稿はインドネシア中心で、日本のSSBJ開示への直接示唆は限定的。
In the global GX context
FLW sits within Scope 3 Category 5 (waste generated in operations) and upstream food-loss accounting, relevant to ISSB/CSRD value-chain disclosure and SDG 12.3 reporting. The Indonesia focus adds LMIC evidence often missing from global disclosure scholarship.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:食品ロスの栄養・環境・経済の三重負荷を整理した出発点として、Scope 3や廃棄物会計研究の枠組み比較に使える。
🏢実務担当者:食品・小売企業の廃棄削減策（期限表示、再分配、ナッジ）の選択肢を把握する参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:新興国での食品ロス政策（表示制度改革・財政措置）設計の論点整理に有用。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Background: ood loss and waste (FLW) represent a critical yet underappreciated challenge to global food and nutrition security, environmental sustainability, and economic development. An estimated 13% of food produced globally is lost along the supply chain. Indonesia ranks among the world's largest contributors to food waste, generating 53–84 kg per capita per year, with households responsible for approximately 80% of this volume. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the magnitude, drivers, nutritional implications, environmental consequences, and effective reduction strategies for FLW, with particular attention to the Indonesian context. Methods: A non-systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, policy reports, and contextual studies published between 2016 and 2026. Results: FLW imposes a triple burden: nutritional, through the loss of macro- and micronutrient-dense foods; environmental, through greenhouse gas emissions, water depletion, and land use; and economic, disproportionately affecting smallholder farmers and food-insecure households. Behavioural interventions, including education and choice architecture nudges, demonstrate moderate effectiveness in reducing consumer-level waste. Policy instruments such as date labelling reform, fiscal measures, and food redistribution systems show promise but remain inconsistently implemented, particularly in low- and middle-income countries including Indonesia. Conclusion: Achieving SDG 12.3's target to halve per capita food waste by 2030 requires coordinated multisectoral action combining measurement, behavioural, regulatory, and technological strategies, adapted to the national and local context.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/nurish/article/download/12449/5231first seen 2026-11-12 05:36:46 · last seen 2026-11-13 05:45:16
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。