インドネシアにおけるグリーン水素投資に向けた産業標準分類規制の緊急性
The Urgency of Industrial Standard Classification Regulations for Green Hydrogen Investment in Indonesia (原題)
(著者不明)
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、インドネシアの産業標準分類（KBLI）にグリーン水素専用の分類が存在しないことが、許認可・環境許可・投資承認に法的・行政的不確実性をもたらすと指摘する。規範的法研究と比較法的手法により、法的確実性・規制明確性・グッドガバナンスの観点から現行枠組みの不整合を分析し、専用KBLIの制定を規範的要請として位置づける。NZE 2050とSDGs達成に向けた制度整備の必要性を論じる。
English
This study argues that Indonesia's industrial classification (KBLI) lacks a dedicated category for green hydrogen, creating legal and administrative uncertainty in licensing, environmental permitting, and investment approval. Using normative legal and comparative methods, it assesses coherence with legal certainty, regulatory clarity, and good governance, and positions a specific KBLI as a normative imperative for Indonesia's NZE 2050 and SDG commitments.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業がインドネシアで水素・アンモニア事業やGX投資を行う際、現地の産業分類・許認可制度の未整備は投資リスク要因となる。日本の水素政策・GX推進と対比し、アジア新興国での制度設計支援や移転可能性を考える材料になる。
In the global GX context
As global hydrogen investment scales, this paper highlights how national industrial classification systems shape legal certainty and investment approval—an under-examined layer of transition finance infrastructure. It offers a comparative reference for jurisdictions designing hydrogen-specific regulatory categories and connects to broader ISSB/TCFD-adjacent disclosure and permitting debates.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:産業分類・許認可制度が水素投資の法的確実性と移行金融に与える影響を比較制度分析の観点から検討する材料を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:インドネシアで水素関連事業を検討する企業は、KBLI分類の未整備が許認可・投資承認の遅延や追加義務につながるリスクを把握すべき。
🏛政策担当者:新興国で水素投資を促進するには、専用の産業分類と許認可枠組みの整備が投資家の法的確実性確保に不可欠であることを示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines the urgent need to establish a specific Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification (Klasifikasi Baku Lapangan Usaha Indonesia/KBLI) for green hydrogen investment as a normative legal necessity within Indonesia’s sustainable energy transition and its commitment to achieving Net Zero Emissions (NZE) by 2050. In fulfilling its obligations under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and its national low-carbon development agenda, Indonesia has adopted various policies promoting renewable energy and green hydrogen development. Nevertheless, the current KBLI framework has not yet provided a distinct classification for green hydrogen-related activities, resulting in their continued inclusion under general gas or manufacturing categories that are normatively and technically inadequate. This study employs a normative legal research method, drawing on statutory and comparative approaches, to evaluate the coherence of Indonesia’s regulatory framework with the principles of legal certainty, regulatory clarity, and good governance. In addition, it compares Indonesia’s KBLI system with regulatory practices in selected jurisdictions that have established specific industrial classifications for green hydrogen. The analysis indicates that the misclassification of green hydrogen-related activities under the KBLI regime may result in significant legal and administrative consequences, particularly in business licensing, environmental permitting, and investment approval processes, as each KBLI category entails distinct regulatory obligations. Therefore, the establishment of a specific KBLI for green hydrogen constitutes not only an administrative adjustment but a normative imperative to ensure legal certainty, promote sustainable investment, and support technological innovation. Such regulatory reform is essential to accelerate the development of Indonesia’s clean energy ecosystem and to align national industrial governance with constitutional mandates and international sustainability commitments.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MI/article/download/80116/40234first seen 2026-09-12 05:28:21 · last seen 2026-09-22 05:01:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。