Enabling Nature‐Based Solutions by Embracing Their Limits: Insights From Governing in Complexity
自然を基盤とした解決策の限界を受け入れることでその実現を可能にする：複雑性のガバナンスからの洞察 (AI 翻訳)
Kerry A. Waylen, Rakhyun E. Kim
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、自然を基盤とした解決策（NbS）の限界を認識する重要性を論じている。複雑な社会生態システムの特性から、NbSには本質的な限界が存在することを指摘し、政策・実践・研究への示唆を提供する。
English
This paper argues for recognizing the inherent limits of nature-based solutions (NbS) stemming from socio-ecological complexity. It identifies three sources of limitation: bounded steerability, contestation of values, and cross-scale misfits, and calls for humility and adaptivity in NbS governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、NbSは気候変動適応や生物多様性保全の文脈で注目されているが、本論文は過度な期待を戒め、複雑性を考慮した政策立案の必要性を示唆する。特に、日本の生態系と制度のミスマッチを考える上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
Globally, NbS have gained traction in climate and biodiversity policies. This paper offers a timely reminder of their limits, which is relevant for international frameworks like the UNFCCC and CBD that increasingly promote NbS.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers should note the three sources of limitation and the call for reflexivity in NbS governance.
🏢実務担当者:Practitioners can use the framework to set realistic expectations and manage trade-offs in NbS projects.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should incorporate humility and adaptivity when designing NbS policies, avoiding overpromising.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Nature‐based solutions (NbS) have become a central concept in contemporary conservation. While much scholarship and practice aim to refine and upscale NbS, we argue that it is important to recognize their inherent limits, which stem from the complexity of socio‐ecological systems. Drawing on literatures about governing in complexity, we identify three fundamental sources of limitation: bounded steerability of complex adaptive systems, inescapable contestation of plural values and power, and persistent cross‐scale misfits between ecological and institutional dynamics. These manifest as recurrent limits for NbS, including shifting priorities, unavoidable trade‐offs, recurring conflicts, unexpected outcomes, external shocks, and contested knowledge. We outline implications for policy, practice, and research: emphasizing humility, adaptivity, and reflexivity as necessary conditions for advancing NbS without overstating their promise.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1111/con4.70074first seen 2026-07-19 05:04:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。