Institutional quality shapes who citizens hold responsible for climate change mitigation
制度の質が市民の気候変動緩和責任の帰属を形成する (AI 翻訳)
Christoph Klebl, Taciano L. Milfont, Jolanda Jetten
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
106カ国のデータを用い、制度の質（政府効率性、規制品質、汚職抑制、法治）が市民の気候変動緩和責任の帰属（政府、企業、個人）に与える影響を分析。制度の質が高い国では企業への責任帰属が強まり、政府への責任はU字型、個人への責任は逆U字型の関係を示した。
English
Using data from 106 countries, this study examines how institutional quality (government effectiveness, regulatory quality, control of corruption, rule of law) shapes citizens' attribution of climate mitigation responsibility to governments, businesses, and individuals. Higher institutional quality increases business responsibility attribution, while government responsibility shows a U-shaped relationship and individual responsibility an inverted U-shape.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では制度の質が高いため、企業への責任帰属が強い可能性がある。気候変動対策におけるマルチステークホルダーの責任分担を考える上で示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, the findings highlight that institutional context shapes public expectations for climate action, which has implications for designing effective mitigation policies that align with citizen responsibility attributions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides cross-national evidence on how institutional quality moderates public responsibility attribution for climate change mitigation.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that climate policies should consider institutional context to align with public expectations of responsibility.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Public beliefs about who is primarily responsible for climate change mitigation vary widely across countries, and little is known about what explains this variation. Drawing on data from 106 countries ( N = 101,728), we examined how indicators of national institutional quality (government effectiveness, regulatory quality, control of corruption, and rule of law) shape people's attributions of climate responsibility to governments, businesses, and individuals. Results showed that the higher a country's institutional quality, the more likely its citizens were to attribute responsibility for climate mitigation to businesses. In contrast, government responsibility attributions followed a U-shaped relationship for institutional capacity dimensions (government effectiveness and regulatory quality), such that citizens in countries with very low or very high institutional capacity were more likely to hold governments responsible. Individual responsibility attribution showed the opposite pattern (inverted U-shaped), with citizens in countries with moderate institutional quality most likely to view individuals as responsible. These associations held after controlling for GDP per capita, perceived importance of climate change, and demographic factors. These findings show that variations in institutional quality are linked to how citizens assign responsibility for climate change mitigation, which suggests that climate mitigation strategies cannot be divorced from institutional contexts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2026.103190first seen 2026-07-19 04:48:50
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。