Comparative evaluation of environmental and economic impacts of residual biomass utilization in China
中国における残渣バイオマス利用の環境・経済影響の比較評価 (AI 翻訳)
Yinan Feng, Wubin Yan, Chuan Zhang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、LCAとTEAを統合し、中国の31のバイオマス利用経路を評価。緑色燃料生産への優先配分が高い収益性と最大の脱炭素効果をもたらすことを示し、部門間の資源配分最適化による低コスト脱炭素化を提案する。
English
This study integrates LCA and TEA to evaluate 31 biomass utilization pathways in China, finding that prioritizing green fuel production offers higher profitability and decarbonization potential. It proposes optimizing inter-sectoral biomass allocation for low-cost decarbonization, providing actionable insights for carbon neutrality strategies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではバイオマス発電が主流だが、燃料・素材分野へのシフトが課題。本研究成果は、日本のバイオマス資源配分の最適化や、SSBJに基づくScope 1・2排出削減戦略の検討に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this study contributes to the discourse on biomass resource allocation under carbon neutrality targets, offering a framework that links LCA/TEA results to stakeholders. It provides evidence for prioritizing green fuels, relevant for countries designing bioeconomy policies and corporate decarbonization strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive LCA/TEA framework for comparing biomass pathways, useful for further research on resource allocation optimization.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for companies in biomass supply chains to identify profitable and low-carbon utilization routes.
🏛政策担当者:Informs policy design for biomass allocation to achieve cost-effective decarbonization and carbon neutrality goals.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Biomass, as a renewable carbon source, offers decarbonization possibilities for a wide range of energy and material-related end uses, including power and heat, fuels, fertilizers, and biomaterials. As the global concerns about climate change and carbon neutrality goals increase, the efficient allocation of limited biomass resources across these competing sectors has become a critical issue. This study integrates Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Techno-economic Analysis (TEA) to compare the benefits of intersectoral biomass resource utilization, and linking the evaluation results to the stakeholders under different system boundaries. Through evaluating 31 representative biomass utilization pathways in China, this framework quantifies the environmental and economic impacts under multiple policy scenarios. The results suggest that prioritizing biomass for green fuel production not only offers higher profitability but also delivers the greatest decarbonization potential across the entire biomass utilization system. This study finds that optimization of inter-sectoral biomass resource allocation could achieve low-cost decarbonization. This study offers valuable technical insights for optimizing biomass resource allocation and provides actionable recommendations for carbon neutrality strategies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1088/2753-3751/ae987afirst seen 2026-08-16 05:06:57
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。