Optimizing Hurricane Evacuation Decisions Under Climate Change: Adaptation Limits and Implications for Sustainable Coastal Resilience

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Provides a novel framework combining AI forecasting and RL to quantify adaptation limits, useful for climate risk modeling research.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for structural risk reduction alongside decision optimization, relevant for corporate climate resilience planning.

🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates that adaptation alone cannot offset climate impacts, supporting policies that integrate mitigation and adaptation.

A central premise of climate adaptation is that better information and smarter decisions can keep escalating hazards within manageable bounds. We test this premise for one of the most information-sensitive decisions in disaster management—ordering a hurricane evacuation—and find that it has limits. Taking Hurricane Irma (2017), the storm behind Florida’s largest evacuation (6.5 million people, 4 million vehicles), as a reference event, we add Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) perturbations to the historical storm and use the Pangu-Weather artificial intelligence (AI) forecasting system to generate 20,000 ensemble members for present-day and future climates (Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5; 2050s and 2080s). As the climate warms, storm intensity rises by 15–20% and forecast uncertainty roughly doubles. A reinforcement learning (RL) framework that optimizes evacuation orders under these conditions then exposes a paradox: although RL’s advantage over fixed policies grows from 7% today to 17% under the 2080s SSP5-8.5, absolute evacuation performance still deteriorates by 44% despite optimization. The optimized future climate outcome (objective: 0.239) is in fact worse than that of suboptimal fixed policies today (0.178)—better decisions cannot compensate for a decision environment that has itself degraded. This is direct, scenario-specific evidence that optimization-based adaptation has a ceiling, with consequences for the long-term sustainability of hazard-exposed coastal regions: keeping such communities safe and livable will require coupling evacuation optimization with structural risk reduction, equitable access to decision-support technology, and aggressive greenhouse gas mitigation that holds future risk within adaptable—and therefore sustainable—bounds. The framework supplies quantitative support for sustainable disaster risk reduction and resilient infrastructure planning aligned with global sustainability goals.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147020first seen 2026-07-13 06:19:06