Unsettling Energy Transitions: Toward a Critical, Anticapitalist, and Plural Perspective
エネルギー転換を揺さぶる：批判的・反資本主義的・多元的視点に向けて (AI 翻訳)
Carlos Tornel, A.D. Dunlap, Joanna Allan, Chris Hesketh, Larry Lohmann
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、低炭素インフラへの急速な言説的シフトが、化石燃料依存を減らすどころか、鉱物採掘やサプライチェーンを通じてグローバル・サウスに不均衡な負荷をかけていると批判する。エネルギーを「関係性」として捉え直し、領土的自決と多様な知に基づく正義、エネルギー自給と充足を重視する批判的アジェンダを提示する。脱植民地化と多元的なエネルギー転換の研究課題を整理する。
English
This review critiques the rapid discursive shift to low-carbon infrastructures, arguing that they often add to fossil fuel systems and impose disproportionate costs on the Global South through mineral extraction and supply chains. It proposes a critical agenda: reconceptualizing energy as a contested relation, centering territorial self-determination and plural knowledge, and prioritizing energy autonomy, sufficiency, and convivial infrastructures. It maps debates and outlines research priorities for plural, anticolonial energy transformations.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策は技術革新と経済成長を重視する傾向があるが、本稿は社会的公正やグローバル・サウスへの影響を考慮する視点を提供する。日本のエネルギー転換議論に批判的視点を補完する。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global debates on energy justice and just transition, challenging mainstream narratives that overlook coloniality and supply chain impacts. It offers a critical lens for policymakers and researchers engaged in transition finance and climate justice.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー転換の批判的レビューとして、正義と脱植民地化の視点を研究に組み込むための枠組みを提供。
🏛政策担当者:エネルギー政策における社会的公正とグローバル・サプライチェーンの影響を考慮する必要性を示唆。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article examines the socioecological and justice implications of the rapid discursive global shift toward low-carbon infrastructures as a response to an accelerating civilizatory crisis. While the idea is to reduce fossil fuel dependence and mitigate this planetary crisis, evidence reveals that low-carbon technologies, or so-called renewable energy, are adding to, rather than replacing, existing fossil fuel–based energy systems. Furthermore, low-carbon technologies remain intertwined with fossil fuels, mining, and mineral extraction alongside extensive supply chains that disproportionately impact the Global South, where mineral and land use as well as environmental and social costs are keenly felt. This review highlights the geopolitical reconfigurations prompted by the so-called energy transition while engaging with critical debates surrounding coloniality, justice, and socioecological well-being perspectives embedded within these processes. Through a comprehensive literature review, the article identifies key trends, critiques, and limitations in these debates, emphasizing notable gaps. It advances a critical agenda: to demodernize “energy” by treating it as a contested relation; to reconceptualize justice around territorial self-determination and multiple ways of knowing and living; to treat transitions as conflictual reconfigurations that can intensify extraction; and to prioritize energy autonomy, sufficiency, and convivial infrastructures that reduce dependence. The review maps debates on, identifies gaps in, and outlines research priorities for plural, anticolonial energy transformations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-121124-064238first seen 2026-08-06 04:48:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。