← 論文一覧に戻る

Characterization of Greenhouse Gases Emissions by Economic Sectors Using Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis (EEIOA)

環境拡張産業連関分析(EEIOA)を用いた経済部門別温室効果ガス排出特性の分析 (AI 翻訳)

Yujin Park, Junbeum Kim, Daeseung Kyung, Hung‐Suck Park

대한환경공학회지📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2022-09-30#Scope 3経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.4491/ksee.2022.44.9.308
原典: https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2022.44.9.308
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は2017年韓国環境拡張産業連関表(ROKEEIOT)を構築し、経済部門別のScope 1,2,3排出量と排出原単位を推定した。直接排出では電力・蒸気・上下水道部門が最大だが、サプライチェーン全体では建設、輸送機器、電子機器が上位を占め、輸出誘発排出が41.68%を占めることを示した。排出削減政策にはScope別の特性を反映した科学的アプローチが必要と結論付けた。

English

This study constructs the 2017 Republic of Korea Environmentally Extended Input-Output Table (ROKEEIOT) to estimate Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions by economic sector. Direct emissions are highest in electricity, steam, and water supply, but supply-chain-wide emissions are highest in construction, transportation equipment, and electronics. Export-induced emissions account for 41.68% of total final demand emissions, highlighting the need for carbon competitiveness in export industries. The study concludes that GHG reduction policies should reflect Scope-specific emission characteristics.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ開示やサプライチェーン排出の把握が進む中、産業連関分析によるScope 3推計は、企業の排出量算定や政策立案に有用な手法を示す。特に輸出産業のカーボン競争力強化やCBAM対応の観点で参考になる。

In the global GX context

This study provides a robust EEIOA-based methodology for estimating Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, which is highly relevant to global disclosure frameworks like ISSB and CSRD. The finding that export-induced emissions account for a large share of total emissions underscores the importance of carbon border adjustment mechanisms and supply-chain decarbonization policies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:EEIOAを用いたScope 3推計の方法論と、部門別排出特性の分析結果は、サプライチェーン排出研究に有用。

🏢実務担当者:サプライチェーン排出の把握やScope 3算定の参考になり、特に輸出企業はCBAM対応の示唆を得られる。

🏛政策担当者:部門別・Scope別の排出特性を踏まえた排出削減政策の設計に示唆を与える。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Objectives : As climate change deepened, the concept of 2050 carbon neutrality was introduced. The COP 26 Glasgow Agreement strengthened the national greenhouse gases (GHGs) target of 2030. However, there are controversies over the feasibility of these GHGs reduction goals, considering the economic sectors energy policy and the attributes of GHGs emissions. Taking this into consideration, this study aimed to formulate the 2017 Environmentally Expanded Input-output Table to analyze the characteristics of GHGs emissions in Korea's economic sectors.Methods : The carbon dioxide emission was calculated by multiplying carbon dioxide emission factors to fuel consumption in the 2017 energy balance table, while other GHGs emissions are taken from the national GHGs inventory. All the GHGs emissions calculated and taken were allocated to 381 basic sectors of the Input-Output Table to represent each sector's characteristics of GHGs emissions. Then 381 sectors are combined into a large category of 35 sectors to formulate the 2017 Republic of Korea Environmentally Extended Input-Output Table (ROKEEIOT). Using this ROKEEIOT, the emission of Scope 1. 2, and 3 by economic sectors were estimated, and the GHGs emissions and GHGs intensity by economic sectors.Results and Discussion : The carbon dioxide emissions calculated by the 2017 ROKEEIOT prepared in this study showed a difference of 2% from the 2017 national GHGs emission statistics, confirming that the 2017 ROKEEIOT is very effective. The three economic sectors with the highest direct GHGs emissions were electricity, steam, chilled or hot water, air conditioning supply (262,280 kt CO2eq.), primary metal products (117.098 kt CO2eq.), and transportation equipment (58,332 kt CO2eq.). However, the total GHGs emissions were different in the order of construction (151,476 kt CO2eq.), transportation equipment (112,168 kt CO2eq.), computer, and electronic and optical instruments (107,868 kt CO2eq.). As a result of classifying the scope of GHGs emissions, 6 industries exceeded 50% in Scope 1, and 29 sectors exceeded 50% in Scope 3, indicating that GHGs reduction measures were necessary for the supply chain in consideration of the GHGs emissions characteristics by economic sectors. In particular, 41.68% of GHGs emissions induced by final demand were generated by exports confirming, confirming the urgent need to strengthen the carbon competitiveness of export industry in preparation for the introduction of the carbon border adjustment mechanism.Conclusion : The economic contribution, direct GHGs emissions of industries, and the amount of GHGs emissions induced by supply chains and value chains show very different patterns by economic sectors. Therefore, it was confirmed that scientific policies to reduce GHGs emissions, such as net-zero and climate change measures, should reflect the characteristics of Scope 1, which is direct emission by industry, Scope 2 emissions caused by electricity and steam consumption and scope 3 emissions generated along the supply chain or value chain.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。