グローバル気候変動ガバナンスの促進：政策評価のためのニュートロソフィック多基準意思決定分析
Promoting Global Climate Change Governance: A Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Analytics for Policy Evaluation (原題)
Galip Cihan Yalçın, Karahan Kara, Elif Gürdal Limon, Metin Aksoy, Ömer Uğur, Vladimir Šimić, Onur Limon, Ahmet Görgen, Dragan Pamucar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、気候変動政策の選択にニュートロソフィック集合（T2NN）に基づく多基準意思決定手法を適用した。T2NN–Schweizer-Sklar–SITDEで基準を重み付けし、DEPARTで政策を順位付けする。EU向け8政策の評価では「持続可能性統合」基準が最重要となり、文化・規範的パワーに基づく気候外交政策が最適とされた。感度・比較分析で頑健性を確認している。
English
This study applies a type-2 neutrosophic multi-criteria decision-making model (T2NN–Schweizer-Sklar–SITDE–DEPART) to select climate change policies. Criteria are weighted via SITDE and policies ranked via DEPART. Evaluating eight EU policy alternatives, 'sustainability integration' emerged as the most important criterion, and a climate diplomacy policy based on cultural/normative power ranked best. Robustness was verified through sensitivity and comparative analyses.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
EUの気候政策選定を対象とした意思決定支援手法であり、日本のSSBJ・有報開示や政策形成に直接の示唆は限定的。ただし、政策評価に不確実性を扱うニュートロソフィック手法を導入する点は、日本での気候政策・規制影響評価の高度化に関心を持つ読者に参考となる。
In the global GX context
The paper contributes to global climate governance scholarship by formalizing policy selection under uncertainty using neutrosophic MCDM, with an EU application. It offers a methodological template for comparing policy options, though it does not directly engage TCFD/ISSB/CSRD disclosure frameworks or transition finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:不確実性下の政策選好を扱うニュートロソフィックMCDMの応用例として、手法論的関心を持つ研究者に有用。
🏢実務担当者:企業の開示・サステナビリティ実務への直接的示唆は乏しい。
🏛政策担当者:EUの気候政策選定における基準重み付けと代替案評価の枠組みとして、政策立案プロセスの設計に参考となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The increasing emission of greenhouse gases in modern life has motivated individuals and societies to take action to prevent or slow down climate change. International collaborations have also prioritized climate change by incorporating it into their agendas and developing relevant policies. The primary objective of this study is to develop decision analytics for selecting the most appropriate climate change policy among alternative options. This research proposes a multi-criteria decision-making approach based on neutrosophic sets, specifically the type-2 neutrosophic number (T2NN)–Schweizer-Sklar–skewness impact through distributional evaluation (SITDE)–deviation-based pairwise assessment ratio technique (DEPART) model, for the climate change policy selection process. Within neutrosophic multi-criteria decision analytics, the most suitable policy is identified based on expert evaluations of the climate change policy selection criteria. The criterion weighting is performed through the novel T2NN–Schweizer-Sklar–SITDE method. Policy ranking is conducted using the DEPART method. The proposed neutrosophic multi-criteria decision analytics is applied by developing eight alternative climate change policies for the European Union (EU). The results showed that the "sustainability integration" criterion has the highest importance. "Policy proposal – 4 (climate diplomacy and policy based on cultural and normative power)" is determined to be the best policy option. The robustness of the presented neutrosophic multi-criteria decision analytics is verified through sensitivity and comparative analyses. Based on the findings, practical implications and recommendations are provided for EU policymakers.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.66972/iscis21202615first seen 2026-09-20 04:32:49
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。