政策からインパクトへ：持続可能な開発目標達成のためのグリーンファイナンス手法のランキング
From policy to impact: ranking green finance instruments for sustainable development goals achievement (原題)
Anastasia Doras, Cristina Criste, Cristina-Elena Voicu, O. Lobonţ
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、TOPSIS法を用いて6つのグリーンファイナンス手法を5つの基準で評価し、SDGs達成に最も効果的な手法をランク付けした。結果、炭素市場メカニズムが最も高いパフォーマンスを示し、グリーン投資ファンドと保証制度が続いた。単一の手法では不十分で、市場ベース、公共支援、規制の統合的アプローチが必要と結論付けた。
English
This study ranks green finance instruments for SDG achievement using TOPSIS multi-criteria analysis. Carbon market mechanisms score highest due to economic efficiency and private capital mobilization, followed by green investment funds and guarantees. The authors conclude that an integrated policy mix is necessary, as no single instrument suffices.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、GX経済移行債やカーボンプライシング導入が進む中、本研究成果は政策ミックスの設計に示唆を与える。特に、炭素市場の有効性を実証した点は、今後の国内排出量取引制度の設計に参考となる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global debates on transition finance by providing a comparative ranking of green finance instruments. Its findings on carbon markets' effectiveness are relevant for jurisdictions implementing carbon pricing under the Paris Agreement and for ISSB-aligned disclosure frameworks that require climate-related financial risk assessment.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a multi-criteria framework for comparing green finance instruments, useful for further empirical testing.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into which green finance instruments are most effective for mobilizing capital, aiding in strategic allocation.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for an integrated policy mix, with carbon markets as a key component, for achieving SDGs.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study proposes identifying and ranking the most effective green finance strategies to support the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, using a multi-criteria analysis method (TOPSIS) applied to environmental, economic, and social performance criteria. The dataset is based on a constructed evaluation matrix that assesses six green finance instruments across five performance criteria: environmental impact, private capital mobilisation, economic efficiency, institutional feasibility, and social equity. Scores were assigned using a scale from 1 to 10, based on recent empirical studies and policy reports. The findings suggest that carbon market mechanisms achieve the highest performance, mainly due to their strong economic efficiency and their ability to mobilise private capital. Green investment funds and guarantee instruments also perform strongly, as they effectively attract resources and reduce investment risks. In contrast, green bonds and financial regulations are moderately effective due to their indirect or limited impact on capital mobilisation. Subsidies remain important for early-stage transitions but raise concerns related to fiscal sustainability. The results suggest that no single green finance instrument is sufficient to address the multidimensional challenges of sustainable development. Instead, an integrated approach that combines market-based instruments, public support mechanisms, and regulatory frameworks is required. Such a balanced policy mix allows the strengths of each instrument to complement one another, thereby enhancing overall effectiveness, reducing trade-offs across criteria, and accelerating progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.53486/dri2026.49first seen 2026-08-30 05:19:50 · last seen 2026-09-22 05:08:22
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。