← 論文一覧に戻る

気候法第7552号後のトルコの炭素価格：CBAMと国内排出量取引制度の評価

Turkish carbon pricing after Climate Law No. 7552: an assessment of the CBAM and the National Emissions Trading System (原題)

Ataç Aytuğ

Journal of International Trade Law and Policy📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-31#炭素価格Origin: Global経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: manufacturing
DOI: 10.1108/jitlp-07-2026-0122
原典: https://doi.org/10.1108/jitlp-07-2026-0122

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、トルコの気候法第7552号と国内排出量取引制度（TR-ETS）の設計が、EU炭素国境調整メカニズム（CBAM）第9条の「実効的に支払われた炭素価格」控除に与える法的影響を検討する。パイロット段階での無償割当100%により、対象施設の支払い炭素価格がほぼゼロとなり、CBAM負担からトルコ輸出企業を保護できないと指摘。控除最適化のための設計提案を行う。

English

This study examines the legal implications of Türkiye's Climate Law No. 7552 and its national ETS (TR-ETS) design on the 'carbon price effectively paid' deduction under Article 9 of the EU CBAM. It finds that 100% free allocation in the pilot phase leaves Turkish exporters with little protection from CBAM, and proposes a deduction-optimized design with higher auction share, floor price, carbon tax, and stronger MRV.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、2026年度からの排出量取引制度本格稼働や、欧州CBAMへの対応が課題。トルコの事例は、無償割当とCBAM控除の関係という、日本企業が直面しうる問題を先取りして示す点で示唆に富む。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global carbon pricing scholarship by analyzing how domestic ETS design interacts with CBAM's Article 9 deduction, offering a comparative framework for third countries with partial free allocation. It provides empirical evidence on the effectiveness of carbon pricing in reducing CBAM liability.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a doctrinal-comparative framework for analyzing CBAM-ETS interactions, applicable to other third countries.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights the risk of relying on free allocation for CBAM protection and suggests design elements for effective carbon pricing.

🏛政策担当者:Informs design of national ETS to maximize CBAM deduction and protect export competitiveness.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Purpose This study aims to examine the legal implications of the design of Türkiye’s Climate Law No. 7552 and the National Emissions Trading System (TR-ETS) in relation to the “carbon price effectively paid” deduction under Article 9 of the European Union (EU) Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) Regulation. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a doctrinal-comparative method. It rests on an analysis of EU and Turkish primary legislation, the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the Turkish Constitutional Court, and secondary literature, and it is supported empirically by Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat) foreign trade data. Findings Because the 100 % free allocation envisaged for the pilot phase not only brings the carbon price actually paid by covered installations close to zero but also engages the “rebate or other form of compensation” clause in the second sentence of Article 9, the TR-ETS in its present form offers Turkish exporters little protection from the CBAM burden during the pilot years. Research limitations/implications The indicative burden calculation is based on an assumed sector-average emission intensity; facility-specific calculations may vary. The findings should be reassessed once the expected implementation process regarding third-country carbon price offsetting is adopted. Practical implications The study proposes a deduction-optimised design that raises the auction share, sets a floor price, adds support through a carbon tax and strengthens the MRV infrastructure. Originality/value This study presents a doctrinal analysis of the legal relationship between Turkiye’s new climate legislation and the reduction mechanism set out in Article 9 of the CBAM, and proposes a comparative framework that could also be applied to other third countries that have begun with partial free allocation.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。