Indicators for Assessing Urban Resilience to Climate Change
気候変動に対する都市のレジリエンス評価指標 (AI 翻訳)
Ha Dinh Nghiem, Ayyoob Sharifi, Kamaleddin Aghaloo, Md. Nazmul Haque
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
気候変動リスクに直面する都市のレジリエンス評価指標について、161本の研究と1,064の指標を系統的にレビュー。指標の96.6%が定量的だが、時間的目標はほとんどなく、気候変動に明示的に対応する指標は3分の1にとどまる。技術インフラ偏重でガバナンスや公平性が軽視され、アフリカや南米など脆弱な地域のデータも不足。適応・緩和・社会的公平性のコベネフィットを統合したハイブリッド枠組みを提案。
English
This systematic review of 161 studies and 1,064 indicators on urban climate resilience reveals that 96.6% are quantitative but almost all lack time-bound targets. Only one-third explicitly address climate change, and mitigation is underrepresented. Current frameworks overemphasize technical infrastructure while neglecting governance and equity. Geographic gaps leave African, South American, and Oceanian cities invisible. The authors propose hybrid frameworks integrating adaptation, mitigation, and social equity co-benefits.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の都市も気候変動による豪雨や熱波のリスクが高まっているが、自治体のレジリエンス指標は統一されていない。本レビューは、指標設計における時間的目標やガバナンス・公平性の重要性を指摘し、SSBJやTCFDとは異なる都市計画の観点から示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a global taxonomy of urban resilience indicators, highlighting critical gaps such as lack of time-bound targets, underrepresentation of governance and equity, and geographic biases. For cities worldwide—especially those in climate-vulnerable regions—it offers a roadmap for developing more comprehensive and inclusive resilience assessment frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers on urban climate resilience will find a comprehensive indicator taxonomy and evidence of methodological gaps in existing frameworks.
🏢実務担当者:Urban planners and sustainability officers can use the proposed hybrid framework to design locally relevant, integrative resilience indicators.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note the need for time-bound, climate-explicit targets and participatory governance structures in urban resilience planning.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Cities face escalating climate risks, yet their resilience efforts remain fragmented and poorly measured. Our systematic review of 161 studies and 1,064 indicators provides a taxonomy of indicators and reveals critical gaps. While 96.6% of indicators are quantitative, nearly all lack time-bound targets, which are essential for tracking progress. More concerning, only one-third explicitly address climate change, with mitigation strategies underrepresented. Current indicators and assessment frameworks emphasize technical infrastructure while neglecting governance processes and equity considerations, both of which are vital to inclusive adaptation. Geographic disparities compound these limitations, as African, South American, and Oceanian cities remain largely invisible despite facing acute climate vulnerabilities. A promising path forward emerges through indicators that integrate co-benefits across adaptation, mitigation, and social equity. We propose hybrid frameworks combining universal metrics and indicators with context-sensitive ones, embedded within participatory governance structures. Without such integration, cities risk optimizing for measurable outcomes while missing opportunities for transformative urban resilience.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-121124-015717first seen 2026-07-21 04:54:54
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。