銀行業におけるESGリスクガバナンスを形作る人工知能:体系的文献レビューからの証拠
Artificial intelligence shaping ESG risk governance in banking: Evidence from a systematic literature review (原題)
(著者不明)
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、銀行業におけるAIとESG指向のサステナビリティ政策の相互作用を、リスクガバナンスの観点から検討する。PRISMA準拠の体系的文献レビューにより248件から20件を選定し、AIがESG開示・報告、信用リスク評価、気候リスク分析、サステナブルファイナンス、責任あるAIガバナンスに主に用いられることを示す。先行研究がAI導入の直接的影響に偏る中、モデルガバナンスや取締役会監督などのガバナンス機構の重要性を強調し、AI–ESGリスクガバナンス統合フレームワークを提案する。
English
This systematic literature review examines how risk governance architecture shapes the interaction between AI and ESG-oriented sustainability policies in banking. From 248 records, 20 studies were synthesized, showing AI is mainly applied to ESG disclosure, credit risk, climate risk analytics, sustainable finance, and responsible AI governance. The authors propose an AI–ESG risk governance integrative framework, arguing that model governance, accountability, and board oversight are essential for successful AI-enabled ESG deployment.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
SSBJ基準や有報でのサステナビリティ開示が進む日本では、銀行のESGリスクガバナンスとAI活用の統合は、金融機関の開示体制構築や投資家対応に直結する。特に気候リスク分析やモデルガバナンスの枠組みは、日本のメガバンクや地域金融機関がTCFD/SSBJ対応を進める上で実務的示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As global disclosure frameworks (TCFD, ISSB, CSRD) push banks to formalize climate and ESG risk governance, this paper's integrative framework links AI capability to institutional accountability. It contributes to the AI-ESG literature by centering governance architecture, offering a conceptual basis for regulators and standard-setters evaluating AI use in sustainability reporting and risk management.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:AIとESGの統合におけるガバナンス機構の理論的枠組みを提供し、実証研究の空白を示す。
🏢実務担当者:銀行のサステナビリティ・リスク部門がAI導入時にモデルガバナンスや取締役会監督を設計する際の指針となる。
🏛政策担当者:AIを活用したESGリスク管理に対する監督・規制の枠組みを検討する際の参考になる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
This paper examines how risk governance architecture shapes interactions between artificial intelligence (AI) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-oriented sustainability policies in the banking industry. Most current research treats AI as a technological capability that directly affects ESG performance, yet little is known about the governance systems that produce these outcomes. Using PRISMA-guided SLR procedures, we selected 20 studies from 248 initial records identified in the Scopus and Web of Science databases that met the inclusion criteria and conducted a thematic synthesis. The results show that AI is primarily used in ESG disclosure and reporting, credit risk assessment, climate risk analytics, sustainable finance, and responsible AI governance. The literature remains dispersed across theoretical stances, including the resource-based view, stakeholder theory, institutional theory, legitimacy theory, and AI governance literature. Previous research has largely ignored the governance mechanisms that enable successful implementation, focusing instead on the direct implications of AI adoption for ESG-related outcomes. The study proposes an AI–ESG risk governance integrative framework to address this gap. This framework places risk governance architecture at the center of the relationship among AI capabilities, institutional pressures, stakeholder expectations, and ESG-oriented sustainability outcomes. The approach views AI as a strategic capacity integrated into enterprise-wide risk governance systems rather than merely a technical or compliance tool. The results indicate that strong governance arrangements, such as model governance, accountability frameworks, board supervision, and alignment with organizational risk appetite, are necessary for successfully deploying AI-enabled ESG. By offering an integrative theoretical framework and practical insights for banking organizations seeking to improve sustainability performance and long-term resilience through responsible AI use, this study contributes to the growing body of AI-ESG literature.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://www.bis.org/publications/202206-guidelines-principles-effective-management-and-supervision-climate-related-financial-risks.pdffirst seen 2026-09-12 05:52:50 · last seen 2026-09-21 05:20:18
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。