← 論文一覧に戻る

制度的保証、イノベーション環境、インバウンド観光の生態学的持続可能性:貿易コストの経路

Institutional Assurance, Innovation Environment, and Ecological Sustainability of Inbound Tourism: The Trade-Cost Channel (原題)

Rongjun Huang, Chonlavit Sutunyarak

Research in Ecology📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-21#その他Origin: CN対象セクター: tourism
DOI: 10.30564/re.v8i4.13528
原典: https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v8i4.13528

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

中国のインバウンド観光における制度的保証とイノベーション環境が生態学的持続可能性に与える影響を、貿易コストを媒介として分析。2004~2024年の22の主要観光送客国パネルデータを用い、ICT規制、法の支配、イノベーション成果からIAI指数を構築。結果、IAIの向上は貿易コストを下げ、観光パフォーマンスを高め、持続可能性に寄与することを示した。

English

This paper examines how institutional assurance and innovation environment affect ecological sustainability of China's inbound tourism, with trade costs as a mediator. Using panel data from 22 source countries (2004-2024), the authors construct an IAI index from ICT regulation, rule of law, and innovation output. Results show that stronger IAI lowers trade costs and improves tourism performance, supporting sustainability through better service coordination and destination management.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の観光政策や地域活性化に示唆を与えるが、GX(脱炭素)やESG開示との直接的な関連は薄い。日本のインバウンド観光の持続可能性を考える際の参考にはなるが、気候変動や排出削減の視点は限定的。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to sustainable tourism literature by linking institutional quality and innovation to ecological outcomes via trade costs. While not directly addressing climate disclosure or transition finance, it offers insights for destination management and policy coordination that could complement broader sustainability strategies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:観光経済学と持続可能性の関係を貿易コストの媒介効果で分析した方法論を参考にできる。

🏢実務担当者:観光関連企業は、制度的環境とイノベーションが業務効率と持続可能性に与える影響を理解するのに有用。

🏛政策担当者:観光政策立案者は、制度整備とイノベーション促進が持続可能な観光に寄与する点を政策に反映できる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

The rapid growth of inbound tourism has brought economic benefits to China but has also increased ecological pressure on destination regions. Foreign visitors now rely heavily on digital services during their trips, yet the effectiveness of these services depends on institutional assurance and innovation capacity. This paper examines how institutional assurance and the innovation environment relate to the ecological sustainability of China's inbound tourism, and whether trade costs act as a transmission mechanism. Using panel data from 22 major tourism source countries over 2004–2024 (excluding 2020–2022), we construct an Institutional Assurance and Innovation Environment (IAI) index from three indicators: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) regulation, rule of law, and innovation output, combined through principal component analysis (PCA). The index is validated by the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure and Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the models are estimated with country fixed effects. The results show that a stronger IAI is associated with higher inbound tourism performance and lower trade costs, and that lower trade costs are in turn associated with better tourism performance. A Sobel test supports the mediating role of trade costs (z = 3.96, p < 0.001), and the findings remain stable under an equal-weighted index and component-level regressions. Because lower transaction frictions reduce redundant travel arrangements and inefficient resource use, institutional and innovation conditions can support more sustainable tourism through better service coordination and more efficient destination management, helping China balance tourism growth with ecological conservation.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。