エネルギー強靱性を評価する多次元フレームワーク：メキシコからのエビデンス（2019–2022年）
A Multidimensional Framework for Assessing Energy Resilience: Evidence from Mexico (2019–2022) (原題)
Tiare Robles-Bonilla, Karla G. Cedano, Oscar Sánchez Santillán
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、エネルギー強靱性を技術・環境・経済・制度・社会の5次元で評価する枠組みを提案し、メキシコの2019〜2022年のデータに適用した。結果、技術的進展と再生可能エネルギー法規の改善が見られる一方、社会・制度面が遅れ、環境面はCOVID-19期に一時改善したがその後後退した。SDG 7および9のモニタリングに貢献する。
English
This study proposes a multidimensional framework to assess energy resilience across technical, environmental, economic, institutional, and social dimensions, applied to Mexico (2019-2022). Results show uneven resilience: technical advances and regulatory improvements, but social and institutional lags, with environmental gains during COVID-19 reversed later. Supports SDG 7 and 9 monitoring.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではエネルギー強靱性の評価枠組みは主に技術的観点に偏りがちだが、本フレームワークは社会・制度面を含む総合的評価を提供し、日本のエネルギー政策や地域レジリエンス計画に示唆を与える。特に、データ制約下での評価手法は、日本の自治体や企業のレジリエンス評価に応用可能。
In the global GX context
Globally, this framework offers a transparent, non-weighted approach to energy resilience assessment, addressing gaps in sociotechnical dimensions. It provides a practical tool for policy design and SDG monitoring, relevant to countries with uneven data availability. The Mexican case offers insights into shock responses, applicable to global energy transition discussions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel multidimensional framework for energy resilience assessment, useful for comparative studies and indicator development.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical tool for energy resilience monitoring and identifying priority interventions, applicable to corporate sustainability planning.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of social and institutional dimensions in energy resilience, informing policy design for equitable transitions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Energy systems are foundational to sustainable development because they enable essential services and underpin progress across the SDGs. Yet recent shocks have shown that development gains can be undermined when energy systems are unable to absorb, adapt, and recover. In practice, assessments of energy resilience often remain narrowly focused on technical performance, limiting their usefulness for SDGs delivery and policy design.This study advances a sustainability-grounded, interdisciplinary framework that assesses energy resilience across five dimensions—technical, environmental, economic, institutional, and social—operationalised through 18 indicators. Novelty of the framework lies in offering a transparent, non-weighted temporal assessment that makes sociotechnical aspects of energy resilience operational and comparable over time, particularly in contexts where data availability is uneven. We apply the framework to Mexico using normalised national-level data for 2019–2022, enabling comparison over time and to identify where resilience is strengthening or eroding across dimensions. Results show uneven resilience. The technical dimension registers specific advances, alongside regulatory improvements in the legal framework for renewable energy. By contrast, the social and institutional dimensions lag, shaped by weaker performance and by limitations in data availability. The environmental dimension exhibits a temporary improvement during the COVID-19 period, followed by setbacks in subsequent years, suggesting sensitivity to external shocks.By making strengths, gaps, and shock-responses visible in a single, multidimensional profile, the framework provides a practical basis for prioritising interventions and evaluating policy pathways towards resilient infrastructures and equitable transitions. Its implementation can support monitoring and delivery efforts related in particular to SDG 7 and SDG 9.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2026.101478first seen 2026-08-24 04:49:07
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。