持続可能な金融移行：政策手段、ESG統合、比較的視点
Sustainable Financial Transition: Policy Instruments, ESG Integration, and Comparative Perspectives (原題)
Yusuf Khalilov
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
持続可能金融がESG目標と金融システムをどう整合させるかを比較・統合的に分析した概説研究。先進国は規制基盤と制度能力で優位な一方、新興・低所得国は構造的制約によりESG統合の効果が限られると指摘する。データ制約や報告基準の分断が比較可能性を損なう課題を挙げ、開示枠組みの調和とグリーンボンド等の金融手法を政策提言として示す。
English
A comparative, integrative review of how sustainable finance aligns financial systems with ESG objectives. It argues developed economies benefit from advanced regulation and institutional capacity, while emerging and low-income countries face structural constraints limiting ESG integration. Key challenges include data gaps, methodological inconsistency, and fragmented reporting standards; harmonised disclosure, integrated policy design, and instruments like green bonds and sustainability-linked loans are emphasised.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
SSBJ基準の確定や有報・統合報告書でのESG開示義務化が進む日本では、開示枠組みの調和と比較可能性の議論は直接的に実務へ示唆を与える。特に報告基準の分断是正は日本企業の投資家対応コスト低減に直結する。
In the global GX context
Amid ISSB/CSRD/SEC climate rule convergence debates, this paper's call for harmonised disclosure frameworks and cross-sector coordination speaks directly to global disclosure scholarship. Its developed-vs-emerging distinction is useful for framing transition finance gaps in global markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:ESG統合と持続可能金融の政策・開示枠組みを横断的に整理した概念的枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:開示基準の分断やデータ制約への対応、グリーンボンド等の資金調達手段の位置づけを把握する材料になる。
🏛政策担当者:開示枠組みの調和と文脈適応的な政策設計の必要性を裏付ける論点を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines the evolving role of sustainable finance in aligning financial systems with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives. Adopting a comparative and integrated perspective, the analysis combines insights from ESG frameworks, regulatory developments, and financial innovation to evaluate how sustainability considerations are incorporated into capital allocation processes. The study argues that sustainable finance represents a systemic transformation extending beyond traditional risk–return frameworks toward long-term value creation, resilience, and financial stability. The findings indicate that developed economies benefit from advanced regulatory structures and institutional capacity, while emerging and low-income countries face structural constraints that limit the effectiveness of ESG integration. These differences highlight the need for context-specific and adaptive policy approaches. The study also identifies key challenges, including data limitations, methodological inconsistencies, and fragmented reporting standards, which reduce comparability and reliability of ESG assessments. From a policy perspective, the results emphasise the importance of harmonised disclosure frameworks, integrated policy design, and stronger cross-sector coordination, particularly across energy, water, and food systems. In addition, innovative financial instruments-such as green bonds and sustainability-linked loans—alongside digital finance solutions are highlighted as key mechanisms for enhancing capital mobilisation and improving transparency in sustainable finance markets. Overall, the study contributes to the literature by developing an integrated conceptual framework linking financial markets, policy mechanisms, and sustainability objectives, offering practical insights for policymakers, investors, and researchers.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.67907/jtfer.103first seen 2026-11-05 04:33:53 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:26:52
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。