The Transatlantic Rift in Climate Policies
気候政策における大西洋横断の亀裂 (AI 翻訳)
J. Pietras
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、EUと米国の気候政策における乖離の拡大を分析。EUは規制重視、米国はインセンティブ重視のアプローチをとり、IRAやCBAMが貿易と協力に影響を与えると論じる。部分的収束の可能性も指摘。
English
This paper examines the growing divergence in transatlantic climate policies between the EU and US, driven by differing institutional capacities and economic priorities. It highlights the impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act and carbon border adjustment mechanisms, and warns of risks to cooperation and trade.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
EUと米国の政策乖離は、日本企業の欧州・米国市場でのコンプライアンス戦略に直結する。CBAM対応やIRAの恩恵享受には、両極の制度理解が不可欠。日本のGX政策はどちらにも属さない独自路線だが、影響は避けられない。
In the global GX context
As Japan navigates its own GX strategy, understanding the EU-US rift helps anticipate global carbon pricing trends and trade friction. The paper provides a framework for Japanese firms to assess regulatory risks in both markets, especially regarding CBAM and IRA subsidies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparison of EU and US climate policy architectures, useful for studying policy convergence and divergence.
🏢実務担当者:Helps corporate sustainability teams understand regulatory risks and opportunities in transatlantic markets, particularly CBAM compliance.
🏛政策担当者:Offers insights into the geopolitical implications of misaligned climate policies, relevant for Japan's positioning in global climate negotiations.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article examines the growing divergence in transatlantic climate policies between the European Union and the United States, analysing its structural, political, and economic drivers as well as its broader implications. While the EU has pursued an increasingly regulatory and normative approach – centered on binding emissions targets, carbon pricing, and sustainability standards – the United States has adopted a more fragmented and incentive-based strategy, shaped by domestic political constraints and sub-federal governance. This paper argues that this divergence has widened in recent years due to differing institutional capacities, economic priorities, competitiveness concerns, and perceptions of climate urgency. Particular attention is paid to the impact of the Inflation Reduction Act, carbon border adjustment mechanisms, and industrial policy instruments on transatlantic relations. The analysis demonstrates that, despite periods of renewed political engagement by the US in climate action, policy misalignment risks undermining cooperation, distorting trade, and weakening collective climate ambition. At the same time, the article identifies areas of partial convergence, starting with theoretical concepts, the objectives of climate negotiations, and approached to third-countries’ climate efforts. The article concludes that the transatlantic climate rift could lead to a complete rupture and therefore requires a pragmatic approach to the EU’s climate ambitions and strategic patience regarding future US re-engagement within an evolving geopolitical context.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.33067/se.1.2026.1first seen 2026-06-10 05:16:01
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。