脱炭素化と持続可能なサプライチェーン:サプライヤーエンゲージメント、デジタルトレーサビリティ、炭素ガバナンスに関する系統的レビュー
Decarbonization and Sustainable Supply Chains: A Systematic Review of Supplier Engagement, Digital Traceability, and Carbon Governance (原題)
Israr Hussain Raisani, Kamran Khan, Ifrah Khalid Ghauri, Aurangzeb Zulfiqar Khan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、サプライチェーン脱炭素化におけるサプライヤーエンゲージメント、デジタルトレーサビリティ、炭素ガバナンスの役割を、PRISMA 2020に基づき25件の論文から分析した。結果、サプライヤー協働やデジタル技術(ブロックチェーン、AI、IoT等)が排出削減に有効である一方、コストやデータ品質、規制差などの課題が明らかになった。統合的アプローチの必要性を提唱している。
English
This systematic review analyzes 25 peer-reviewed articles on supply chain decarbonization, focusing on supplier engagement, digital traceability, and carbon governance. Findings show that supplier collaboration and digital technologies (blockchain, AI, IoT) enhance emissions reduction, but face challenges like cost, data quality, and regulatory differences. The review proposes an integrated approach combining these elements for effective decarbonization.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示基準やサプライチェーン排出量算定が企業に求められており、本レビューの知見はScope3対応やサプライヤー連携の実務に示唆を与える。特にデジタル技術活用は、中小企業を含むサプライチェーン全体の排出データ収集に有用である。
In the global GX context
Globally, this review aligns with ISSB and CSRD requirements for Scope 3 disclosure, offering a synthesis of best practices in supplier engagement and digital traceability. It highlights the role of carbon governance in enhancing accountability, relevant for companies navigating evolving disclosure regulations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of current literature and identifies research gaps in supply chain decarbonization, useful for framing future studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers practical insights into supplier engagement strategies and digital tools for Scope 3 emissions management, aiding corporate sustainability teams.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of regulatory frameworks and standards in enabling effective carbon governance across supply chains.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Decarbonizing supply chains is becoming a coordinated effort for managing emissions beyond organisations' boundaries. This systematic literature review is aimed at analysing the role supplier engagement, digital traceability and carbon governance play in sustainable supply-chain decarbonization. The 25 peer-reviewed journal articles included in this study were selected and analysed based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines as used in Scopus and Web of Science from 2015 to 2026 using descriptive analysis and thematic synthesis. The results suggested that supplier collaboration, supplier development, carbon targets, incentives and knowledge sharing increased supplier involvement in emissions reduction. Digital traceability and technologies, such as blockchain, artificial intelligence, IoT, big data analytics and digital twins, improved carbon measurement, transparency and data sharing. Carbon governance enhanced accountability via reporting, standards, monitoring, disclosure and compliance mechanisms. However, financial costs, data-quality limitations, interoperability, supplier resistance, digital capability gaps, and regulatory differences constrained implementation. The review suggests a comprehensive solution that brings together supplier relations, electronic traceability and carbon management with emissions reductions and sustainable supply-chain decarbonization. References Ahmed, S., Zaidi, S. S. Z., & Zohaib, S. (2026). Maritime transport transformation and supply chain disruptions: A systematic literature review of challenges and carbon emission reduction strategies. Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18618204 Ahmed, S., Zaidi, S. S. Z., Zohaib, S., & Imran, M. (2026). Developing and validating a measurement scale for maritime transport changes, supply chain disruptions, challenges, and carbon emission reduction efforts. Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Morskiej w Szczecinie, 86(158). https://doi.org/10.17402/687 Alotaibi, E. M., Khallaf, A., Abdallah, A. A., Zoubi, T., & Alnesafi, A. (2024). Blockchain-driven carbon accountability in supply chains. Sustainability, 16(24), 10872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410872 Bager, S. L., Singh, C., & Persson, U. M. (2022). Blockchain is not a silver bullet for agro-food supply chain sustainability: Insights from a coffee case study. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100163 Borchardt, M., Pereira, G., Milan, G., Pereira, E., Lima, L., Bianchi, R., & Carmo, A. S. D. (2025). Are sustainable supply chains managing Scope 3 emissions? A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 17(13), 6066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136066 Butt, A. S., Alghababsheh, M., Sindhwani, R., & Gwalani, H. (2024). Role of supplier engagement to reduce Scope 3 emissions in circular supply chains. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 598–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3994 Bux, C., Lombardi, M., Rana, R. L., & Tricase, C. (2026). Decarbonization strategies in the wine supply chain: From environmental mitigation towards integrated sustainability management. Environments, 13(4), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13040195 Cloutier, C., Oktaei, P., & Lehoux, N. (2019). Collaborative mechanisms for sustainability-oriented supply chain initiatives: State of the art, role assessment and research opportunities. International Journal of Production Research, 58(19), 5836–5850. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1660821 Dahlmann, F., & Roehrich, J. K. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management and partner engagement to manage climate change information. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1632–1647. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2392 Eckerman, J., Clémençon-Charles, E., & Brinton, S. (2023). Decarbonizing utility supply chains. Climate and Energy, 39(10), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.22343 Ghosh, P., Jha, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Managing carbon footprint for a sustainable supply chain: A systematic literature review. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 2(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSCRA-06-2020-0016 Govindan, K., Shaw, M., & Majumdar, A. (2020). Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123075 Guo, L., Miller, S., Zhou, W., Wei, Z., Ren, J., Huang, X., Xing, X., White, H., & Yang, K. (2025). Critical appraisal of methodological quality and completeness of reporting in Chinese social science systematic reviews with meta-analysis: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 21(1), e70014. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70014 Hettler, M., & Graf-Vlachy, L. (2023). Corporate Scope 3 carbon emission reporting as an enabler of supply chain decarbonization: A systematic review and comprehensive research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3486 Iannizzi, C., Akl, E. A., Anslinger, E., Weibel, S., Kahale, L. A., Aminat, A. M., Piechotta, V., & Skoetz, N. (2023). Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing, and appraising living systematic reviews: A scoping review. Systematic Reviews, 12(1), 238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02396-x Jia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.248 Karlsson, I., Rootzén, J., & Johnsson, F. (2019). Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains: Analysis of a Swedish road construction project. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 120, 109651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109651 Lee, C., Miller, D., Jefferies, M., Xu, Y., Chong, H., Tsang, W. C., Rowlinson, S., & Skitmore, M. (2026). Governance and digital technologies for carbon data quality: A systematic review of procurement-driven decarbonization in construction supply chains. Sustainability, 18(10), 4921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104921 Liew, M., & Cao, J. (2024). Green supply chain management for carbon accountability. Energy Economics, 138, 107840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107840 Lindsay, C., Blancquaert, I., & Rousseau, F. (2025). Tools used to appraise the quality of studies included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in human genetics: A systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics, 33(11), 1392–1401. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01861-6 Lintukangas, K., Arminen, H., Kähkönen, A., & Karttunen, E. (2022). Determinants of supply chain engagement in carbon management. Journal of Business Ethics, 186(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05199-7 Liu, J., Yeoh, W., Qu, Y., & Gao, L. (2022). Blockchain-based digital twin for supply chain management: State-of-the-art review and future research directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03966. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4113933 Mathur, U., & Bansal, S. (2024). Quantifying Scope 3 supply chain emissions using IoT devices. International Journal of Science and Research, 13(6), 1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR24619063500 Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001 Palaniappan, U., Jain, N., & Subramanian, N. (2026). Supply chain climate policies and focal firms' effort in reducing Scope 3 emissions: A longitudinal analysis of Indian firms. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71150 Raynor, M. E., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2025). Scope 3 decarbonization through environmental attribute certificates. Carbon Management, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2025.2486624 Shaheen, N., Shaheen, A., Ramadan, A., Hefnawy, M. T., Ramadan, A., Ibrahim, I. A., Hassanein, M. E., Ashour, M. E., & Flouty, O. (2023). Appraising systematic reviews: A comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8, 1268045. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1268045 Shi, Y., Tang, C. S., & Wu, J. (2025). Are firms voluntarily disclosing emissions greener? Production and Operations Management, 34(8), 2363–2377. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478251318917 Stenzel, A., & Waichman, I. (2023). Supply-chain data sharing for Scope 3 emissions. npj Climate Action, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00032-x Ströher, T., Körner, M., Paetzold, F., & Strüker, J. (2025). Bridging carbon data's organizational boundaries: Toward automated data sharing in sustainable supply chains. Electronic Markets, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00779-7 Tidy, M., Wang, X., & Hall, M. (2015). The role of supplier relationship management in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from food supply chains: Supplier engagement in the UK supermarket sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3294–3305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.065 Villena, V. H., & Dhanorkar, S. (2020). How institutional pressures and managerial incentives elicit carbon transparency in global supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 66(6), 697–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1088 Zhang, C., Xu, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Blockchain traceability adoption in low-carbon supply chains: An evolutionary game analysis. Sustainability, 16(5), 1817. https://doi
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.63544/jbii.v5i8.165first seen 2026-08-22 06:09:00 · last seen 2026-09-02 05:59:16
- openalex https://doi.org/10.63544/jbii.v5i8.165first seen 2026-08-23 04:53:37
- semanticscholar https://insightfuljournals.com/index.php/JBII/article/download/165/276first seen 2026-08-27 05:20:26 · last seen 2026-09-21 04:52:59
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。