土壌浄化のためのバイオ炭：汚染抑制と炭素隔離の相乗効果—グリーン低炭素評価に関する批判的レビューと展望

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:バイオ炭の浄化・炭素隔離の相乗効果とトレードオフを定量評価する際の知見ギャップと評価枠組みの必要性を把握できる。

🏢実務担当者:土壌浄化や炭素除去クレジットに関わる企業が、バイオ炭の効果が条件依存で長期安定性に不確実性がある点を理解し、安易な炭素隔離主張を避ける判断材料になる。

🏛政策担当者:ネガティブエミッション技術の評価・認証制度設計において、明確なシステム境界と不確実性分析を備えた評価枠組みの必要性を示す。

Abstract Background Soil contamination and climate change represent dual environmental challenges requiring integrated solutions. Biochar, a carbon-rich material derived from biomass pyrolysis, has attracted growing interest for its potential to simultaneously immobilize soil pollutants and sequester carbon. However, existing reviews typically address pollutant remediation and carbon sequestration separately, and the synergies and trade-offs between these functions remain insufficiently synthesized. A standardized green low-carbon assessment framework for biochar-based soil remediation is also lacking. This review critically evaluates biochar application in contaminated soil, combining bibliometric analysis with systematic evaluation of pollutant immobilization, carbon sequestration potential, and their interrelationships. Main text Analysis of Web of Science literature confirms that biochar effectively immobilizes a wide range of heavy metals and organic pollutants, though efficiencies vary substantially with biochar properties, soil conditions, and contaminant types. For heavy metals, average removal rates range from 31 to 69%, with cationic metals most effectively immobilized and anionic metals least amenable. For organic pollutants, reported efficiencies span 28% to 86%, though the evidence base remains limited and dominated by short-term studies, raising concerns about long-term re-release upon aging. Carbon sequestration potential varies widely, with carbon abatement factors spanning 0.03 to 1.3 across feedstocks and production conditions, though uncertainties persist regarding long-term stability. Notably, the dual benefits carry inherent tensions: modifications and production conditions that enhance one dimension may compromise the other. Current research largely evaluates remediation and carbon effects independently, lacking integrated methodologies to quantify net environmental benefits. Conclusions This review identifies critical knowledge gaps and proposes two future directions: site-specific biochar customization to improve remediation quality and efficiency, and development of a comprehensive green low-carbon assessment framework with clear system boundaries, computable indicators, and uncertainty analysis. Advancing these fronts will facilitate quantification of biochar remediation efficacy and support broader field deployment, realizing the full potential of biomass waste conversion into a valuable environmental resource.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-026-01571-wfirst seen 2026-11-15 05:07:22