Evaluation of Energy Consumption and the Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Dairy Cattle Farms in Adana Province of Türkiye
トルコ・アダナ県における乳牛農場のエネルギー消費と温室効果ガス排出量の評価 (AI 翻訳)
Hasan Kaan Küçükerdem
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はトルコ・アダナ県の乳牛農場25戸を対象に、直接エネルギー（電気＋ディーゼル）と水使用に伴うGHG排出量を定量化した。機能単位は補正乳1kg当たりで、カーボンフットプリントは1.61kg CO2-eqと算出された。ディーゼルがエネルギー消費・排出の9割以上を占め、水関連排出も大きいことが明らかになり、効率改善の優先分野を示している。
English
This study quantifies GHG emissions from direct energy (electricity + diesel) and water use in 25 dairy farms in Adana, Türkiye. The carbon footprint per kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk is 1.61 kg CO2-eq, with diesel accounting for 91% of emissions. Water-related processes contribute significantly, highlighting key mitigation areas for dairy operations.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の酪農分野でも同様の計測手法は応用可能だが、エネルギー構成や水利用体系が異なるため、直接の参考にはならない。ただし、農業分野のGHG排出削減策を検討する際の事例として有用。
In the global GX context
This paper provides granular emission factors for dairy production in a Mediterranean context, contributing to the global literature on agricultural GHG accounting. It underscores the dominance of diesel and water-related emissions, which are relevant for supply-chain decarbonisation efforts in the food sector.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides farm-level emission factors for dairy in a Mediterranean climate.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights diesel and water as key emission sources for dairy operations, informing efficiency improvements.
🏛政策担当者:Supports targeted mitigation policies in the livestock sector.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study quantifies greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with direct energy (electricity + diesel) use and water consumption in dairy cattle farms in Adana, Türkiye. A stratified random sample of 25 farms across 15 districts was surveyed. The functional unit is 1 kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM). Direct energy covers electricity and diesel used for milking and milk cooling, cleaning of milking and storage equipment, feed preparation and distribution, manure handling, ventilation, lighting, and routine cleaning. Water use includes equipment, facility and shelter cleaning, and animal drinking water. Environmental sustainability indicators and carbon footprints were computed accordingly. For 1 kg FPCM, electricity accounts for 5.71% of total direct energy consumption, while diesel accounts for 94.29%. In GHG terms, 8.97% of emissions arise from electricity and 91.03% from diesel. The dairy sector’s carbon footprint is 1.61 kg CO₂-eq per kg FPCM, comprising 0.82 kg CO₂-eq from direct energy and 0.80 kg CO₂-eq from water consumption. On a per-animal basis, the annual carbon footprint per lactating cow totals 1 639.36 kg CO₂-eq cow⁻¹ yr⁻¹, consisting of 354.51 kg CO₂-eq from direct energy and 1 284.85 kg CO₂-eq from water use. These results highlight diesel’s dominance in energy use and GHG emissions, and the substantial contribution of water-related processes, underscoring priority areas for efficiency improvements and mitigation interventions in Adana’s dairy operations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.36846/cjafs.2026.224first seen 2026-07-09 06:09:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。