Modular multi-domain AI framework for sustainable construction material optimisation
持続可能な建設材料最適化のためのモジュール型マルチドメインAIフレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
A. Pournaghshband, F. Piadeh, Mohsen Ahmadi, A. Sahaf
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
建設部門の環境負荷低減に向け、AI駆動の意思決定支援フレームワークを開発。LCAモデリング、材料代替シナリオ、混合専門家ニューラルネットワークによる予測、持続可能性最適化を統合し、英国のオフィスビルを対象に1500シナリオを評価。環境・循環性・コストのバランスを効率的に実現する材料構成を特定した。
English
This study develops an AI-driven decision-support framework integrating LCA, scenario-based material substitution, mixture-of-experts neural networks, and sustainability optimization. Using a UK office building case study with 1500 scenarios, it efficiently identifies material configurations balancing environmental, circularity, and cost performance, expanding feasible design solutions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の建設業界では、脱炭素社会に向けた建材選定の重要性が高まっており、本フレームワークは設計初期段階での環境負荷評価を効率化する点で有用。SSBJやサステナビリティ情報開示が進む中、LCAデータを活用した材料最適化は、企業の環境性能向上と開示対応に貢献する可能性がある。
In the global GX context
Globally, this framework addresses the need for scalable tools to assess embodied carbon in construction, aligning with TCFD/ISSB disclosure trends and circular economy goals. It offers a method to integrate AI with LCA for early-stage design, supporting decarbonization in the built environment.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel integration of AI and LCA for multi-criteria material optimization, offering a methodological template for further research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical tool for early-stage design to evaluate material trade-offs, aiding sustainability reporting and procurement decisions.
🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates how AI can enhance LCA-based building regulations and support embodied carbon reduction policies.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The construction sector is a major contributor to global environmental impacts, largely driven by the embodied emissions of structural materials. Early-stage material selection therefore represents a critical opportunity for impact reduction; however, conventional life-cycle assessment (LCA) approaches remain limited in systematically evaluating large numbers of feasible material configurations under multiple and often conflicting sustainability criteria, constraining effective decision-making during design. To address this limitation, this study develops an artificial intelligence – driven decision-support framework for the systematic exploration and optimisation of construction material configurations within a fixed building design. The framework integrates LCA modelling, scenario-based material substitution, predictive modelling using mixture-of-experts backpropagation neural networks, and sustainability-oriented optimisation within a unified workflow. A reinforced-concrete office building in the United Kingdom is used as a case study to generate 1500 technically feasible material scenarios by varying concrete compositions (including GGBS and fly ash substitution), reinforcement steel production routes, cement formulations, and end-of-life pathways. Scenario outputs from OneClick LCA are used to train the predictive models, enabling rapid estimation of multiple sustainability indicators, which are subsequently coupled with a shuffled frog leaping optimisation algorithm using a composite sustainability index. The results demonstrate that the framework efficiently identifies material configurations that balance environmental, circularity, and cost-related performance while expanding the range of feasible design solutions beyond conventional scenario-based evaluation. The proposed framework provides a scalable and flexible decision-support tool for early-stage design, enabling systematic assessment of trade-offs and supporting informed material selection under practical design and feasibility constraints.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108582first seen 2026-08-15 05:30:43 · last seen 2026-08-16 05:42:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。