Low-Carbon Retrofitting for Existing Urban Residential Buildings in China: A Systematic Review of Policies, Measures and Performance

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:The review identifies research gaps in consistent evaluation boundaries and lifecycle carbon accounting, guiding future studies on building retrofits.

🏢実務担当者:Insights on integrated retrofit packages and multi-level policy frameworks can help corporate sustainability teams plan effective building upgrades.

🏛政策担当者:The multi-level policy framework and performance evaluation methods offer a reference for designing large-scale retrofit programs and linking policy with technology.

Existing urban residential buildings contribute substantially to operational energy use and carbon emissions in the building sector, making low-carbon retrofitting a key approach to improving the performance of the existing housing stock. This study conducts a bibliometric and systematic review of research on low-carbon retrofitting of existing urban residential buildings in China. Journal articles published between 2015 and 2025 were retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus, and 91 studies were retained after screening. Bibliometric analysis was used to examine annual publication trends, source distribution, keyword co-occurrence, thematic evolution, and organizational collaboration. The systematic review further synthesised evidence on retrofit policies, technical measures, and performance evaluation methods. The results indicate a clear increase in publications in recent years, with research attention shifting from basic energy-saving measures towards multi-objective optimization, carbon reduction, and thermal comfort improvement. The review suggests that China’s residential retrofit policies can be understood as a multi-level framework supporting retrofit implementation. Retrofit strategies have gradually shifted from individual measures towards integrated retrofit packages, while performance evaluation has expanded from energy-saving assessment to broader considerations of carbon emissions, occupant comfort, and economic feasibility. The review highlights the need for more consistent evaluation boundaries, stronger integration of lifecycle carbon accounting and occupant behaviour, and climate-responsive retrofit strategies. These findings provide a structured basis for comparing retrofit approaches, strengthening the connection between policy and technology, and supporting decision-making in large-scale residential retrofit programmes.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142792first seen 2026-07-16 05:18:17