Gateway to Environmental Sustainability: Energy Related Risk, Institutional Quality, and Renewable Energy Transition Toward <scp>SDGs</scp> 7, 13, and 16 in the <scp>G7</scp> Economies
環境持続可能性へのゲートウェイ：エネルギー関連リスク、制度の質、そしてG7経済における再生可能エネルギー移行（SDGs 7,13,16へ向けて） (AI 翻訳)
Youxia Tong, Samuel Duku Yeboah, Michael Provide Fumey
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、1996年から2023年のG7諸国データを用い、制度の質がエネルギー関連リスクを緩和し再生可能エネルギー導入を促進するかを分析。QQR手法により不均一な効果を発見：日本とドイツは一貫した正の相関、英国・米国などは混合的な結果。強固な制度がエネルギーリスクを低炭素移行へ転換する重要性を示す。
English
This study uses 1996-2023 data from G7 economies to examine whether institutional quality protects against energy-related risks and promotes renewable energy adoption. Using quantile-on-quantile regression, it finds heterogeneous effects: Japan and Germany show uniform positive correlations, while the UK, US, and others show mixed or adverse effects at some quantiles. The results underscore the role of robust institutions in transforming energy risks into low-carbon transitions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本が一貫してエネルギーリスクと再生可能エネルギー導入に正の相関を示した点は、福島後の政策対応と制度的強靭性を反映。日本のGX政策やSSBJ開示におけるリスク管理と移行戦略の統合に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
The paper provides G7 cross-country evidence that institutional quality moderates energy risk impacts on renewable transition. For global audiences, it reinforces the need for governance reform alongside technology deployment, relevant to TCFD/ISSB risk disclosure frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides cross-country quantile evidence on institutional quality as a moderator of energy risk-renewable uptake link, useful for policy design studies.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights that reactive institutions can turn energy price/supply risks into opportunities for renewable investment; relevant for corporate risk management.
🏛政策担当者:Offers differentiated policy recommendations for G7 countries: robust institutions are key to energy security and decarbonization.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT The worldwide transition to a low‐carbon economy, guided by ESG criteria and the SDGs, has heightened the need for a renewable energy transition and sustainable environmental development. Nevertheless, energy‐related risks such as energy price fluctuations, energy supply interruptions, geopolitics, and policy uncertainties still pose problems in ensuring energy security and climate change resiliency among G7 countries. In terms of ESG criteria, high‐quality institutions and governance are vital for encouraging renewable energy use and environmental sustainability. In this study, we analyze whether good governance and institutions guarantee energy risk protection and promote the use of renewable energy in G7 economies using data from 1996 to 2023. Based on Institutional Theory and the Risk–Resilience Framework, we employ a novel quantile‐on‐quantile regression (QQR) technique that demonstrates distributional and asymmetric effects, with supportive evidence from bidirectional analysis and interaction modeling of institutional quality. We detect considerable heterogeneity: Japan and Germany show uniform positive correlations between renewable take‐up and energy related risk, whereas the United Kingdom, Italy, and the United States exhibit mixed or adverse effects at some quantiles. These findings reiterate that robust, reactive institutions are central to transforming energy‐market risks into low‐carbon, secure futures and outline policy recommendations for secure energy transitions specifically tailored to advanced economies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71481first seen 2026-07-27 05:14:30
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。