← 論文一覧に戻る

農業管理慣行下における土壌微生物炭素経済戦略のトレードオフ:全球メタ分析

Trade‐Offs in Soil Microbial Carbon Economic Strategies Under Agricultural Management Practices: A Global Meta‐Analysis (原題)

Yiqing Wang, Jinghui He, Josep Peñuelas, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Jordi Sardans, Chaoxiang Yuan, Yan Peng, Qiqian Wu, Zimin Li, Xiangyin Ni, Fuzhong Wu, Kai Yue

European Journal of Soil Science📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-01#気候科学Origin: Global経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70426
原典: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32449146.v1

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

1957観測・140野外実験の全球メタ分析により、農業管理が土壌微生物の炭素経済戦略(獲得・変換・配分・放出)に与える影響を評価。稲わら還元は獲得・変換・放出を大幅に増加させる一方、有機施肥・保全耕起・輪作・間作は放出を増やさず獲得・変換・配分を高め、炭素保持に有効な慣行であることを示した。

English

A global meta-analysis of 1,957 observations from 140 field experiments assessed how agricultural management shapes soil microbial carbon economic strategies (acquisition, conversion, allocation, release). Straw return raised acquisition, conversion, and release sharply, whereas organic fertilization, conservation tillage, and diversified cropping enhanced retention without increasing CO2 release, highlighting practices that boost microbial carbon retention.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では農地由来のGHG削減や土壌炭素貯留がGX政策・J-クレジット農業分野で注目される。本論文は有機施肥・保全耕起・輪作の効果を全球規模で定量化し、国内の営農型炭素クレジット設計やScope 3農業サプライチェーン評価の科学的根拠として参照価値がある。

In the global GX context

Globally, soil carbon is increasingly embedded in climate disclosure and nature-related frameworks (SBTN, TNFD, CSRD ESRS E4) and in agricultural supply-chain accounting. This meta-analysis provides quantitative, management-specific evidence on which practices retain microbial carbon without raising CO2 release, informing soil-carbon crediting methodologies and corporate agricultural Scope 3 strategies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:土壌微生物炭素経済戦略の全球的応答パターンと手法間(化学量論モデル・18O・13C)の差異を定量化した基盤的知見を提供する。

🏢実務担当者:有機施肥・保全耕起・輪作・間作が炭素放出を増やさず微生物炭素保持を高める点は、農業サプライチェーンの脱炭素・土壌炭素クレジット設計に活用できる。

🏛政策担当者:農地炭素貯留を促す政策・クレジット制度設計において、放出増を伴わない管理慣行を優先する根拠となり得る。

📄 Abstract(原文)

ABSTRACT Agricultural management profoundly influences soil carbon (C) dynamics by regulating microbial processes that drive C cycling. However, a comprehensive and globally integrated understanding of these mechanisms remains limited. In this study, we defined soil microbial carbon economic strategies (MCES) as four linked processes, including acquisition (β glucosidase and cellobiohydrolase activities), conversion (microbial biomass carbon), allocation (microbial carbon use efficiency), and release (soil CO 2 emissions). Based on 1957 observations from 140 field experiments, this study evaluated the responses of MCES to agricultural management and identified their underlying drivers at the global scale. Results showed that straw return significantly increased microbial C acquisition, conversion, and release by 27.0%, 55.1%, and 94.4%, respectively. Inorganic fertilization significantly increased microbial C allocation and release by 24.1% and 23.2%, respectively. By contrast, conservation tillage and organic fertilization significantly enhanced microbial C acquisition and conversion by 267.7% and 44.8%, respectively, without significantly increasing microbial C release. Crop diversification (rotation and intercropping) and vegetation restoration mainly increased microbial C allocation, as reflected by microbial carbon use efficiency, by 42.5% and 28.6%, respectively, indicating a shift toward more efficient microbial use of assimilated C rather than a broad stimulation of C acquisition, conversion, or release. Management effects on MCES were strongest in topsoil and neutral soils, crop type and climate further modulated these responses, with C 4 crops favoring microbial C conversion and allocation, and arid regions showing stronger increases in microbial C allocation and release. Significant increases in microbial C allocation were mainly detected using stoichiometric modeling and 18 O methods rather than 13 C methods. Globally, predicted microbial C acquisition increased with latitude, whereas microbial C allocation and release showed localized hotspots. These findings reveal contrasting responses among MCES and highlight organic fertilization, reduced soil disturbance, and diversified cropping systems as promising practices for enhancing microbial C retention while limiting potential C losses in agricultural soils.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。