← 論文一覧に戻る

段階的吸着強化ガス化・改質によるバイオマスからの低炭素水素製造:プロセスモデリングと技術経済評価

Low-Carbon Hydrogen Production from Biomass via Staged Sorption-Enhanced Gasification and Reforming: Process Modelling and Techno-Economic Assessment (原題)

Onyekachi U. Idika, Pouriya H. Niknam

Processes📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-11-13#水素Origin: EU経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.3390/pr14223661
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14223661

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

麦わらを原料に、改質前後に独立した炭酸化反応器を置く段階的吸着強化ガス化・改質プロセスをモデル化した研究。従来法に比べ水素含有量が約1.6〜1.7倍に増加し、CaO/原料比0.65でCO2回収が飽和。水素製造コスト(LCOH)は従来構成より約18%低減できると試算された。

English

This study models a staged sorption-enhanced gasification and reforming process using wheat straw, with dedicated carbonation reactors before and after reforming. The staged route yields 1.6–1.7× higher hydrogen content than the conventional no-sorbent route, with CO2 capture plateauing at a CaO-to-feed ratio of ~0.65. Techno-economic assessment shows an LCOH roughly 18% lower than the conventional configuration.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本は水素社会実現とCCSをGX政策の柱に据え、バイオマス由来の低・負排出水素はエネルギー基本計画やGX推進機構の投資対象と重なる。本論文のLCOH低減示唆は国内水素サプライチェーン構築の経済性検討に資する。

In the global GX context

As global disclosure frameworks (ISSB, CSRD) tighten scrutiny of hydrogen's emissions intensity, techno-economic evidence on biomass-to-hydrogen with CO2 capture informs credible transition pathways and negative-emission claims. It supports the case for BECCS-linked hydrogen in corporate decarbonization and transition finance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:段階的吸着強化プロセスの設計変数とLCOH感度の定量評価を提供する。

🏢実務担当者:バイオマス水素調達や負排出クレジット検討時のコスト・回収率の参考になる。

🏛政策担当者:水素導入支援策やCCS連携の経済性評価の根拠として活用できる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

This research introduces a staged sorption-enhanced gasification and reforming process for converting biomass into hydrogen with an accompanying CO2-capture pathway, using wheat straw as feedstock. Renewable hydrogen from biomass gasification is already established as a route to low- and potentially negative-emission hydrogen production when combined with CO2 storage, but conventional SEG systems typically rely on continuous sorbent circulation between interconnected carbonation and regeneration stages. This study instead investigates a staged configuration in which CO2 removal is carried out in dedicated carbonation reactors before and after reforming, while sorbent regeneration is performed separately. In the proposed process, carbonation and calcination take place in separate reactor units, allowing each stage to be independently controlled and optimised. The process model included submodels for pyrolysis and gasification, dual-stage carbonation, steam reforming, CaO regeneration, and hydrogen purification. Sensitivity analysis was carried out across gasifier temperature (500–1000 °C), air-to-feed ratio (0.5–3.0), steam-to-feed ratio (0.5–3.0), and CaO-to-feed ratio (0.3–1.5). The proposed staged route consistently outperformed the no-sorbent conventional route, delivering syngas with a hydrogen content approximately 1.6–1.7 times that of the conventional route under the common baseline conditions, while showing greater resistance to hydrogen loss under excess-air gasification conditions. For the proposed configuration, CO2 capture reached a plateau at a CaO-to-feed ratio of approximately 0.65 kg/kg, with no further increase observed at higher sorbent loadings. Mass-flow analysis confirmed that the proposed configuration produces more hydrogen from wheat straw and creates a pathway for CO2 capture. The economic assessment further showed that the levelised cost of hydrogen (LCOH) for the proposed configuration was approximately 18% lower than that of the conventional configuration. These findings provide an initial assessment of whether staged CO2 sorption integrated with biomass gasification and reforming can improve hydrogen production and the techno-economic performance of biomass-to-hydrogen systems.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。