Household energy transition to clean cooking fuels: a systematic methodological review
家庭用エネルギー転換におけるクリーン調理燃料への移行：系統的方法論レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Joseph Elasu, Joseph Mpeera Ntayi, Muyiwa S. Adaramola, Muhammed Ngoma, Ronnette Atukunda, Byinza Faisal, Charles Olupot
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、家庭用エネルギー転換研究の方法論をPRISMAに従い系統的に分析。52件の研究を対象に、実証主義と定量手法の優位性を指摘し、より包括的な洞察のために混合手法の活用を推奨。
English
This systematic methodological review of 52 studies on household energy transition finds a dominance of positivist quantitative approaches, limiting capture of socioeconomic and cultural dimensions, and recommends mixed-methods for policy-relevant insights.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では都市部の調理燃料はほぼガス・電力だが、途上国のエネルギーアクセス改善やSDG7達成に向けた方法論的示唆は国際展開する日本企業・支援機関に参考となる。
In the global GX context
The review highlights methodological gaps in energy transition research, relevant for global south contexts. It offers guidance for designing more robust, context-sensitive studies that can inform clean cooking policies, especially in Africa and Asia.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This review provides a taxonomy of methods used in household energy transition research and identifies blind spots due to over-reliance on quantitative designs.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers in developing countries can use the recommendations to demand mixed-methods evaluations of clean cooking programs for more effective policy design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Although scholarly research on household energy transition has expanded considerably, no systematic methodological review has examined the research approaches used in this field. Methodological reviews are important because they focus on how knowledge is generated rather than on research outcomes, thereby enabling critical assessment of the validity and reliability of existing evidence, particularly in complex and context-dependent research areas such as household energy transition. This study undertakes a systematic methodological review of household energy transition literature following the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 52 peer-reviewed studies were identified and included after a rigorous screening and selection process, with analysis focusing on philosophical orientations, research designs, and methodological approaches. The review reveals a strong dominance of positivist philosophies, with most studies relying primarily on quantitative methods and designs. This methodological emphasis limits the ability to adequately capture the socioeconomic and sociocultural dimensions that shape household energy transition processes. In light of these complexities, the study recommends greater use of mixed-methods designs and methodological pluralism to generate more comprehensive, context-sensitive, and policy-relevant insights into household energy transitions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00430-6first seen 2026-06-16 04:45:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。