港湾ガバナンスはいかにエネルギー転換のリビングラボを形作るか
How port governance shapes living labs for energy transitions (原題)
Sonia Yeh, Christopher Dirzka, Aleksander A. Kondratenko, Frans Libertson, Bénédicte Madon, Veronika Slakaityte
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は港湾ガバナンスとリビングラボ（LL）の適合性を分析する枠組みを構築し、共創・実環境・反復学習・制度定着の4要素とガバナンス条件を結びつける。共に市有会社ながら資産管理や意思決定権限が異なるデンマーク・オールボー港とスウェーデン・トレレボリ港を比較し、前者の港内エネルギーコミュニティは契約・調達・連携の枠組みで進展可能な一方、後者の回廊型構想は複数の自律組織・管轄をまたぐ調整とコミットメントを要すると示す。制度定着はステークホルダー調整・意思決定権限・組織的手段を転換課題の規模に整合させるかに依存する。
English
This study builds a governance–Living Lab fit framework linking port governance conditions to four LL pillars: co-creation, real-life setting, iterative learning, and institutional embedding. Comparing two municipally owned Nordic ports—Aalborg (Denmark) and Trelleborg (Sweden)—it finds that Aalborg's intra-port energy community can leverage contractual, procurement, and partnership interfaces, whereas Trelleborg's corridor-level Green Corridor requires coordination across autonomous organisations and jurisdictions. Institutional uptake depends on aligning stakeholders, decision authority, and organisational instruments with the scope of the transition challenge; findings concern prospective pathways, not completed outcomes.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の港湾脱炭素（カーボンニュートラルポート）政策や港湾管理者のガバナンス設計を考える上で、実験の制度化条件を整理する視点を提供する。自治体所有港湾における意思決定権限と調達・契約インターフェースの違いは、国内港のトランジション設計にも示唆的。
In the global GX context
As ports become nodes of energy-system integration and green corridors, this paper adds to global transition-governance scholarship by showing that experimentation is not governance-neutral. It informs how institutional embedding and multi-jurisdiction coordination shape decarbonisation delivery, relevant to transition-finance and infrastructure disclosure debates.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:港湾・エネルギー転換における実験的ガバナンスとLLの制度定着条件を比較分析する枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:港湾運営・サステナ担当は、調達・契約・パートナーシップの既存インターフェースを脱炭素実験にどう接続するかの設計に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:港湾管理者・自治体は、所有形態が同じでも意思決定権限と資産管理の違いが脱炭素事業の実行可能性を左右する点を政策設計に反映すべき。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Ports are increasingly central to decarbonisation, energy-system integration, and resilience, yet less is known about how port governance shapes experimentation and whether learning becomes embedded in organisational practice. Living Labs (LLs)—organised forms of multi-actor experimentation in real-life settings—offer a promising approach, but are often treated as governance-neutral. This study develops and applies a governance–LL fit framework linking governance conditions to four LL pillars: co-creation, real-life setting, iterative learning, and institutional embedding. We compare two Nordic ports that are both wholly municipally owned companies but differ in their dominant governance configurations and in asset control, operational responsibilities, and decision authority: the Port of Aalborg (Denmark) and the Port of Trelleborg (Sweden). The analysis draws on capacity-building workshops, stakeholder engagement materials, and project documentation, using a proposed energy community in Aalborg and a Green Corridor in Trelleborg as case anchors. The comparison shows that prospective uptake pathways reflect both governance conditions and the scope of the initiative. Aalborg’s intra-port energy community could draw on contractual, procurement, and partnership interfaces within the port ecosystem, whereas Trelleborg’s corridor-level initiative would require coordination and commitment across several autonomous organisations and jurisdictions. Across the cases, the analysis indicates that institutional uptake depends on aligning stakeholders, decision authority, and available organisational instruments with the scope of the transition challenge. Because the evidence captures early-stage LL development rather than completed pilots, the findings concern prospective pathways rather than demonstrated long-term outcomes.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104456first seen 2026-10-25 04:37:01 · last seen 2026-11-04 04:38:26
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。