危機対応から気候情報を踏まえた緊急時管理へ：防災実務への自然基盤ソリューションの統合
From crisis response to climate-informed emergency management: Integrating nature-based solutions into risk reduction practice (原題)
Daniel R. Oros
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
気候変動により災害の頻度・激甚性が増す中、緊急時管理（EM）が危機対応偏重から気候適応・自然基盤ソリューション（NBS）を組み込んだリスク低減へ転換する必要性を論じる。湿地再生・グリーンインフラ・沿岸生態系などの効果を文献・政策枠組みから整理し、気候データ統合、土地利用政策、省庁間調整、投資不足という制約を特定。科学・政策・金融・地域参加を整合させる「気候適応ガバナンス枠組み」を提案し、EM担当者の役割拡大を求める。
English
This paper argues emergency management must shift from crisis response toward climate-informed risk reduction by integrating adaptation and nature-based solutions (NBS). Synthesizing interdisciplinary literature and policy frameworks, it assesses wetland restoration, green infrastructure, and coastal systems, and identifies gaps in climate data integration, land-use policy, interagency coordination, and mitigation investment. It proposes a Climate Adaptation Governance Framework aligning science, policy, finance, and community engagement, urging emergency managers to expand into adaptation planning and resilience governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では気候変動適応法・国土強靱化計画と企業の適応ビジネス・TCFD適応開示が連動しつつある。本稿の適応ガバナンス枠組みは、自治体・企業の防災BCPや適応計画策定、SSBJ開示における物理的リスク評価の実務的示唆として読める。
In the global GX context
Globally, adaptation is moving into mainstream disclosure and finance (TCFD physical risk, ISSB, CSRD, and the growing adaptation-finance agenda). This paper adds a governance framework linking NBS, climate projections, and cross-sector coordination—useful for translating physical-risk disclosure into resilience planning and investment.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a synthesized governance framework bridging emergency management, adaptation science, and NBS evidence, with identified research gaps in data integration and interagency coordination.
🏢実務担当者:Helps sustainability, risk, and BCP teams embed climate projections and nature-based measures into resilience and adaptation planning.
🏛政策担当者:Signals the need to align land-use policy, interagency mandates, and adaptation finance to enable climate-informed emergency management.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change is increasing the frequency, severity, and complexity of hazards, challenging emergency management (EM) systems that prioritize crisis response and recovery over long-term risk reduction. This paper examines how EM can incorporate climate adaptation and nature-based solutions (NBS) to strengthen hazard mitigation and resilience across the EM cycle. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature and policy frameworks, the study synthesizes evidence on ecosystem-based strategies—including wetland restoration, green infrastructure, and coastal systems—and evaluates their effectiveness in reducing the impacts of hazards. The analysis identifies persistent gaps in climate data integration, land-use policy, interagency coordination, and mitigation investment that constrain the adoption of climate-informed practices. Findings indicate that integrating climate projections, NBS, and cross-sector governance into EM planning reduces disaster losses and improves community resilience. The paper proposes a Climate Adaptation Governance Framework to support implementation by aligning science, policy, finance, and community engagement. Results suggest that emergency managers should expand their role beyond operational crisis response to include climate-informed risk reduction, adaptation planning, and resilience governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.1030first seen 2026-09-14 04:44:31
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。