gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Moving Forward With Climate Change Communication in Singapore

シンガポールにおける気候変動コミュニケーションの前進 (AI 翻訳)

Adha Shaleh

ジャーナル2026-05-12#政策
DOI: 10.4324/9781003711865-4
原典: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003711865-4

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

シンガポールの気候変動コミュニケーションを、政府のメッセージ、透明性、リーダーシップ、リフレクシブガバナンスの観点から分析。4つの提言を提示し、トップダウンとボトムアップの両方の取り組みの重要性を強調。

English

This chapter examines climate change communication in Singapore, focusing on institutional messaging, transparency, leadership, and reflexive governance. It offers four recommendations emphasizing top-down and bottom-up initiatives to build trust and shape environmental behavior.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも情報発信と信頼構築は重要。政府・企業・市民の協働における示唆は、日本の気候ガバナンスにも応用可能。

In the global GX context

Climate communication is critical for disclosure frameworks like TCFD and ISSB. Singapore's approach offers lessons on building trust through leadership and participatory governance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Climate communication scholars can explore the role of reflexive governance and institutional trust.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can learn from Singapore's multi-stakeholder engagement strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Government officials can apply the recommendations to improve climate policy transparency and public participation.

📄 Abstract（原文）

This chapter introduces climate change communication in Singapore through the country’s institutional message for climate change awareness, climate change communication transparency, and the importance of climate change leadership and reflexive governance in climate change communication. It articulates examples in Singapore to exemplify strategic action plans, implementations, and most importantly, the coordination between leaders, social institutions, and citizen participation in climate-related visions and programmes. This chapter concludes with four recommendations. First, climate change communication starts with leaders in the government, available data about climate change, and leaders’ commitment to build trust among citizens. This leads to progressive climate policies and interventions (environmental education, environmental laws). Second, institutional messages for climate change awareness start from the top and from the ground up initiatives (as seen in faith-based ecology groups in Singapore). This leads to a fresh interpretation of the environment and citizens’ attitudes towards the environment. Third, climate change communication intersects with environmental governance to build trust and to shape individuals’ behaviour towards the environment. This leads to social institutional arrangements and defines citizens’ roles in the ecosystem. The last recommendation reminds us about reflexive governance as wisdom intelligence or an alternative model that begins by improving government environmental policies through collective reflections and feedback from the participation of key stakeholders in climate-related decisions.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。