Governing Energy Transitions Under System Complexity:Why Coordination Failures Persist Despite Networked Governance
システム複雑性下でのエネルギー移行のガバナンス：ネットワーク型ガバナンスにもかかわらず調整不全が続く理由 (AI 翻訳)
Mikael Johnson
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
エネルギー移行は相互依存するアクター・インフラ・実践の調整に依存するが、既存のガバナンスは線形的責任と資産ベースの性能に偏り、調整不全が続く。本論文は調整不全をシステム機能とガバナンスのミスマッチと捉え、関係的説明責任、整合性のある性能測定、構成的調整という3つの設計原則を提示する。スウェーデンと欧州の地域エネルギーガバナンス事例で枠組みを例証する。
English
Energy transitions depend on coordination across interdependent actors, infrastructures, and practices, yet governance remains oriented toward linear responsibility and asset-based performance, leading to persistent coordination failures. This paper conceptualizes these failures as a mismatch between system functioning and governance, proposing three design principles: relational accountability, alignment-based performance measurement, and constitutive coordination. Illustrated through regional energy governance in Sweden and comparable European settings.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のエネルギー政策は地域分散型エネルギーシステムやカーボンニュートラルに向けた調整課題に直面しており、本論文の設計原則は自治体や地域エネルギーガバナンスの再設計に示唆を与える。特に、系統連系や需給調整など、複数主体の協調が不可欠な領域での政策立案に有用。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global GX scholarship by theorizing coordination failures in energy transitions, offering design principles applicable to complex socio-technical systems. It provides a framework for evaluating governance arrangements beyond linear responsibility, relevant for regions pursuing sector coupling and decentralization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical framework for analyzing governance mismatches in energy transitions, useful for further empirical research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers design principles (relational accountability, alignment-based performance) that can inform regional energy governance and stakeholder coordination.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need to shift from linear governance to constitutive coordination in energy policy, relevant for designing effective transition strategies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Energy transitions depend on coordination across interdependent actors, infrastructures and practices. As electrification, sector coupling and decentralisation reshape energy systems, governance challenges have shifted from control-oriented delivery towards problems of interaction, responsibility and system coordination, yet governance arrangements continue to struggle with persistent coordination failures across institutional contexts. This article argues that such difficulties cannot be explained as implementation problems or insufficient cooperation alone. Coordination failures are conceptualised as manifestations of a mismatch between how energy systems function and how they are governed, distinguishing supply-chain governance assumptions from energy systems operating as service networks. The analysis shows how prevailing governance remains oriented towards linear responsibility and asset-based performance, even as outcomes increasingly depend on coordinated action and resource integration in use. Network-based arrangements represent partial adaptations that acknowledge interdependence without reconfiguring underlying governance logics. Building on this diagnosis, three design principles—relational accountability, alignment-based performance measurement, and constitutive coordination—clarify what a genuine shift in governance logic would entail, as distinct from adaptive overlays. The framework is illustrated through regional energy governance experiences in Sweden and comparable European settings, clarifying why coordination failures persist in sustainability transitions characterised by complex socio-technical interdependence.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147188first seen 2026-08-04 04:55:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。