若者は現実的か？気候・エネルギー教育における批判的言語意識の国際的ケース
Young and realistic? A transnational case for critical language awareness in climate and energy education (原題)
Daniel Wuebben, Sonia Aránzazu Ferruz González, Duilio Lorenzo Calcagno, Marta Paradés, Almudena González del Valle-Brena
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
アルゼンチン、デンマーク、イタリア、スペイン、米国の大学生を対象に、気候変動への懸念とエネルギー転換政策への支持のギャップを調査。政策支持は個人の信念よりも、政策のフレーミング（健康便益や経済的害）に影響されることを発見。エネルギーリテラシー向上のための批判的言語意識に基づく教育介入を提案。
English
Surveying 404 university students across five countries, this study finds that support for energy transition policies is shaped more by policy framing (health co-benefits vs. economic harm) than by climate beliefs. Proposes a critical language awareness-based energy literacy intervention to bridge the climate concern-action gap.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の気候教育やエネルギー政策のコミュニケーションに示唆。特に、健康便益の強調が政策支持を高める可能性は、日本のエネルギー政策における国民理解促進に応用できる。
In the global GX context
Contributes to global discourse on climate communication and policy acceptance, offering cross-national evidence on framing effects that can inform ISSB-aligned transition planning and stakeholder engagement.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Policy framing effects on energy transition support across countries.
🏢実務担当者:Framing strategies for corporate climate communication and stakeholder engagement.
🏛政策担当者:Designing public communication for energy policies to enhance support.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines how to help university students translate climate concern into support for energy transition policies, with specific anchoring to Affordable and Clean Energy (SDG 7) and Climate Action (SDG 13). Using survey data from Argentina, Denmark, Italy, Spain, and the United States ( n = 404), we find near-universal agreement among young people that climate change is human-driven, yet markedly weaker and differentiated support for specific decarbonization policies. Our multivariate regression analyses show that policy support is shaped less by personal beliefs than by how energy and climate policies are framed: perceived health co-benefits consistently raise support, while economic harm narratives suppress it. Together, the findings suggest that the gap between climate concern and action is partly due to a lack of energy literacy, which, we argue, might be ameliorated with critical language awareness (CLA). We present a three-part energy literacy intervention that is grounded in CLA and designed to build students’ capacity to interrogate the construals, trade-offs, and distributional claims embedded in climate and energy discourse, and to connect these to credible, agency-oriented everyday practices bridging SDG 7 and SDG 13.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2026.1876994first seen 2026-08-27 04:56:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。