SDGs連動型持続可能政策の優先順位付けによる遺産配慮型低炭素都市開発
Heritage‐Sensitive Low‐Carbon Urban Development Through SDG ‐Linked Sustainable Policy Prioritization (原題)
Yasir Ahmed Solangi, Cosimo Magazzino
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国の遺産保全地区における低炭素移行を、文化・空間・社会持続性と両立させる意思決定支援枠組みを提案。ファジィAHPで都市美観・再生可能エネルギー統合・史跡保全の重要度を評価し、TOPSIS-Greyで戦略を順位付け。再エネ統合と文化ランドマークの融合が最優先と示された。SDGs 11.4・7・13を都市ガバナンス枠組みに統合する。
English
A decision-support framework aligning SDG 11.4, 7 and 13 prioritizes low-carbon strategies in heritage-sensitive Chinese cities. Fuzzy AHP ranks urban aesthetics, renewable energy integration and historic-site preservation as key criteria; TOPSIS-Grey ranks renewable-plus-cultural-landmark integration highest. Integrated strategies combining conservation with clean energy are recommended for district-level policy.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも歴史的景観地区や既存建築ストックの省エネ改修はGX政策課題であり、自治体の脱炭素計画策定や建築物の省エネ基準対応を検討する実務者にとって優先順位付けの参考枠組みとなりうる。ただしSSBJ・有報開示との直接接続はない。
In the global GX context
Adds to global urban decarbonization scholarship by operationalizing SDG-linked multi-criteria prioritization for heritage districts, a niche largely absent from TCFD/ISSB-aligned municipal disclosure frameworks. Relevant to cities translating net-zero pledges into district-level transition plans.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:MCDM（ファジィAHP＋TOPSIS-Grey）を遺産保全型都市脱炭素に適用した手法例として参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:自治体・デベロッパーが歴史地区の再エネ導入と保全の優先順位を付ける際の評価軸として活用可能。
🏛政策担当者:文化遺産保全と低炭素政策を統合する都市計画ガイドライン策定の根拠として示唆的。
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Chinese cities face the challenge of accelerating the low‐carbon transition while preserving cultural identity, spatial quality, and social sustainability in heritage‐sensitive areas. This study develops a decision‐support framework aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to prioritize strategies integrating cultural heritage preservation, renewable energy, and sustainable urban development under uncertainty. The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to determine the relative importance of the criteria and sub‐criteria, while Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)‐Grey analysis was used to rank the proposed strategies based on expert judgments. The findings of Fuzzy AHP identified Urban Aesthetics as the most important main criterion, followed by Renewable Energy Integration and Preservation of Historic Sites. The TOPSIS‐Grey results indicate that Renewable Energy Integration and Cultural Landmarks is the highest priority, demonstrating the importance of incorporating clean‐energy technologies into heritage sites without compromising their architectural and cultural significance. Sustainable Urban Design and Cultural Districts ranks second, emphasizing pedestrian‐friendly streets, green infrastructure, energy‐efficient public spaces, and district‐level cultural identity. Historical Building Preservation and Green Design ranks third, highlighting the value of combining building conservation with environmentally responsible materials and energy‐efficient technologies. The results indicate that integrated strategies should be prioritized in heritage‐oriented low‐carbon development. The study links SDGs 11.4, 7, and 13 within a unified urban‐governance framework and translates broad sustainability goals into practical policy priorities for Chinese cities and districts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71869first seen 2026-11-07 04:53:40
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。