Research Streams in Biodiversity Finance: A Bibliometric Analysis and Research Agenda
生物多様性金融における研究の潮流：計量書誌学的分析と研究課題 (AI 翻訳)
L. Ante, Friedrich-Philipp Wazinski, Aman Saggu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、生物多様性金融分野の計量書誌学的分析により、8つの主要研究潮流を特定し、その構造と時間的進化を示す。経済学志向と批判的政治経済学志向の研究間の断絶を明らかにし、政策立案者や金融機関への示唆を提供する。
English
This paper employs bibliometric analysis to map the fragmented field of biodiversity finance, identifying eight research streams. It documents silos between economic and critical-political economy approaches, offering a structured research agenda for policymakers, financial institutions, and corporations.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では生物多様性関連の開示が進みつつあり（例：TNFDフレームワークの普及）、本論文の構造的な知見は、日本の企業や投資家が生物多様性金融を理解し、戦略に組み込む際の基盤となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, biodiversity finance is gaining traction alongside climate finance, with frameworks like TNFD emerging. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of research streams, highlighting gaps and opportunities for cross-disciplinary integration that can inform global policy and corporate practice.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The bibliometric mapping identifies under-researched intersections, guiding future studies on biodiversity finance across disciplines.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can use the stream taxonomy to benchmark their biodiversity strategies against academic frameworks.
🏛政策担当者:The analysis reveals the need for policy coherence across conservation, finance, and agriculture sectors, as reflected in the research silos.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Biodiversity loss is accelerating at an unprecedented pace, threatening ecosystem stability, economic resilience, and human well-being, with billions required to reverse current trends. Against this backdrop, biodiversity finance has emerged as a rapidly expanding but highly fragmented field spanning ecology, economics, finance, accounting, and policy. Biodiversity finance supports the conservation, sustainable use, and restoration of biodiversity through targeted financial mechanisms. However, it remains an emerging, complex, and fragmented field, with the majority of relevant knowledge being produced in non-finance journals. This study employs quantitative bibliometric analysis to examine a corpus of 189,456 references underlying 3,998 articles related to biodiversity and finance. The analysis identifies eight primary research streams within the field that concern (1) strategic and financial approaches in global biodiversity conservation, (2) the impact and implementation of payments for environmental services (PES) in developing countries, (3) neoliberal influences and implications in environmental conservation, (4) biodiversity offsets and conservation, (5) ecosystem services and biodiversity, (6) integrating conservation and community interests in biodiversity management, (7) balancing agricultural intensification with biodiversity conservation, and (8) global and corporate biodiversity reporting. The characteristics of each research stream and its prevalent publications are outlined, alongside an analysis of their temporal evolution and the degree of information exchange among the research streams. The findings provide a structured map of the intellectual architecture of biodiversity finance, document pronounced silos between economicallyoriented and critical/political-economy research streams, and translate these patterns into a focused research agenda and implications for policymakers, financial institutions, and corporate actors.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finr.2026.100123first seen 2026-05-15 21:24:32 · last seen 2026-06-16 05:18:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。