← 論文一覧に戻る

Net Zero and Nature Positive: Mapping the Regulatory Impact and Interaction of Global Environmental Goals in Australia

ネットゼロとネイチャーポジティブ：オーストラリアにおける地球環境目標の規制影響と相互作用のマッピング (AI 翻訳)

Anita Foerster, Ella Vines

Monash University📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-23#政策
DOI: 10.26180/33069179.v1
原典: https://doi.org/10.26180/33069179.v1

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、パリ協定と昆明・モントリオール生物多様性枠組みの関係を分析し、オーストラリアにおける気候変動と生物多様性の規制領域をマッピングする。実体法と金融リスク開示義務の2つの領域を比較し、統合的対応の機会と逆効果のリスクを論じる。

English

This article analyzes the relationship between the Paris Agreement and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, mapping two regulatory domains in Australia: substantive environmental law and financial risk disclosure obligations. It highlights opportunities for integrated responses and risks of counterproductive interactions between climate and biodiversity regulation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ開示や生物多様性戦略が進む中、気候と自然資本の統合的開示の枠組みを考える上で示唆に富む。ただし豪州固有の法制度分析であり、日本の読者には規制間連携の概念を参考にできる。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global scholarship on integrating climate and biodiversity governance, particularly relevant as ISSB and TNFD frameworks evolve. It offers a conceptual framework for mapping regulatory domains that can inform policy design in other jurisdictions.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a conceptual framework for analyzing climate-biodiversity regulatory integration.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights how financial disclosure obligations can align with biodiversity goals, useful for sustainability reporting teams.

🏛政策担当者:Offers insights into designing coherent regulatory approaches across climate and biodiversity domains.

📄 Abstract（原文）

While the international climate and biodiversity regimes have developed largely in parallel, there is increasing recognition of the value of integrated responses to climate change and biodiversity loss at different scales of governance. This article explores the relationship between the global goals set out in the Paris Agreement and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, and maps two distinct, but related, regulatory domains through which these are given effect in Australia. The first domain encompasses substantive environmental and climate law instruments at the national scale, which seek to mitigate adverse climate or biodiversity impacts in line with global goals. The second domain includes financial risk disclosure and management obligations in corporations law and associated voluntary industry standards, investor advocacy, and engagement activities which seek to align private sector financial risk management with global goals. This conceptualisation reveals the strengths and weaknesses of different regulatory instruments and activities in supporting Australia’s alignment with global environmental goals, as well as opportunities for constructive interlinkages and risks of counter-productive interactions, between the regulation of climate change and biodiversity at different scales.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。