An Investigation into Socio-Political Constraints on Decarbonization in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
ナイジェリア・アクワイボム州における脱炭素化の社会政治的制約に関する調査 (AI 翻訳)
Uro Edward, Okocha, Sunny
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はナイジェリアのアクワイボム州における脱炭素化の社会政治的制約を調査した。石油収入への政治的関心や社会政治的不安定性、化石燃料への経済依存が脱炭素化を阻害していることが明らかになった。また、ステークホルダーの認識が脱炭素化成果の39.7%の変動を説明することを示した。
English
This study investigates socio-political constraints on decarbonization in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. It finds that political interest in oil revenues, socio-political instability, and economic dependency on fossil fuels significantly hinder decarbonization. Stakeholder perceptions account for 39.7% of the variability in decarbonization outcomes.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では直接的な政策連動はないが、地域コミュニティにおける脱炭素化の社会的障壁を理解する上で参考になる。特に地方でのエネルギー転換において、ステークホルダー間の調整不足が課題となる可能性を示唆。
In the global GX context
This paper adds a critical perspective on socio-political barriers to decarbonization in a fossil-fuel-dependent developing region. For global GX scholars, it underscores that technical solutions are insufficient without addressing governance, political economy, and stakeholder engagement—a lesson relevant to many emerging economies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on socio-political constraints for decarbonization policy in developing oil-producing regions.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need to integrate stakeholder engagement and address political economy barriers in energy transition planning.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This study investigated socio-political constraints on decarbonization in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria, with emphasis on how governance structures, institutional frameworks, political interests, and stakeholder dynamics influence policy implementation and outcomes. A descriptive survey research approach was used in the research, covering three oil-producing Local Government Areas (LGAs) in the state: Eket, Ibeno and Eastern Obolo. The primary data for the study were obtained using structured questionnaires distributed to a sample of 400 respondents selected using a multistage sampling procedure, while field observations were also used. Descriptive statistics, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation (PPMC) and multiple regression analyses were used for analysing the data collected from the field at a 0.05 level of significance. From the analysis, it was found that socio-political elements such as political interest in oil revenues, socio-political instability, and economic dependency on fossil fuels significantly hinder decarbonization processes. Perceived lack of effectiveness of government stakeholders, community stakeholders, and industry stakeholders in the push for decarbonization was established through stakeholder analysis, while it is agreed upon that there is a need for collaboration and awareness for better results. Also, the respondents highlighted the poor progress in the realisation of decarbonization outcomes, such as low levels of reductions in carbon emissions, inadequate use of renewable energy and continued deterioration of the environment. Inferential statistics revealed a statistically significant correlation between socio-political factors and the implementation of decarbonization policies (r = 0.808; p < 0.05), between governance and institutional factors and decarbonization activities (F = 97.609; p < 0.05) and finally between stakeholder roles/perceptions and decarbonization outcomes (r = 0.833; p < 0.05). The regression analysis shows that stakeholder perceptions/roles accounted for 39.7% of the variability in decarbonization outcomes. In conclusion, decarbonization activities in Akwa Ibom State are greatly hampered by the prevailing socio-political factors, institutional weaknesses and ineffective stakeholder involvement in achieving poor environmental transition outcomes.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2026.150600107first seen 2026-07-17 06:11:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。