石油、労働、そして崩れゆく社会契約：トリニダード・トバゴにおけるエネルギー正義と将来のエネルギー移行のレビュー
Oil, labor, and the fraying social contract: a review of energy justice and future energy transition in Trinidad and Tobago (原題)
Randy Ramadhar Singh
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、トリニダード・トバゴの炭化水素部門の歴史をエネルギー正義の観点から分析し、分配・手続き・承認の3つの正義に基づき、1937年の労働不安、OWTUキャンペーン、Alutrint事件、Petrotrin製油所閉鎖を検証する。抽出型社会契約の劣化を指摘し、参加型エネルギーガバナンスと公正な移行を提唱する。
English
This review analyzes Trinidad and Tobago's hydrocarbon history through energy justice, examining four events using distributional, procedural, and recognition justice. It finds a degraded extractive social contract and proposes participatory governance and just transition pathways to decarbonization by 2065.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、エネルギー正義の視点はSSBJやカーボンプライシング議論に不足しがちであり、公正な移行の社会的側面を補完する示唆を提供する。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper contributes to energy justice scholarship, offering a framework for just transition in petro-states, relevant for countries like Norway and Scotland, and complements ISSB/CSRD discussions on social aspects.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a historical political economy framework for energy justice in petro-states.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for stakeholder engagement and social license in energy projects.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for participatory governance and transparent benefit distribution in energy transitions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This review explores the history of Trinidad and Tobago's hydrocarbon sector through the lens of energy justice. The unresolved issue in Trinidad and Tobago, as in many petro states, is achieving a democratic transition that genuinely includes affected people. Energy justice is the starting point for sustainable transition. It considers future energy systems, decarbonization, and sustainable policies. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature, government archives, and comparative studies with other nations, the review covers 169 years of oil and gas, from the first drilled Merrimac well in 1857 to current plans for cross-border gas cooperation with Venezuela and a 30% renewable-energy electricity target by 2030. Adopting a three-level energy justice approach of distributional, procedural, and recognition justice, the paper analyses four events: the 1937 labor unrest, OWTU campaigns (1960-1985), the Alutrint case, and the Petrotrin refinery closure in 2018. The study finds a degradation of the extractive social contract: a weaker state-citizen relationship driven by rent-based governance rather than democratic accountability. Unlike Norway, Nigeria, Venezuela, Alaska, and Scotland, Trinidad and Tobago is characterized by procedural and recognition justice problems of distressed petro-states rather than transition countries. This paper proposes a new social contract model that emphasizes participatory energy governance, transparent benefit distribution, planning for a just transition and energy democracy, and a path to decarbonization through 2065. In accordance with PRISMA 2020, the paper employs the Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and UWI Library Repository databases, analyzing 61 documents out of 1256. The key innovation lies in combining historical political economy with future-oriented policy, connecting energy justice diagnostics to practical institutional reforms, and overcoming political economy obstacles that have prevented reforms in Trinidad and Tobago.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.55670/fpll.fuen.5.3.5first seen 2026-08-20 04:59:40 · last seen 2026-09-22 04:52:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。